Comment by FranchuFranchu
Comment by FranchuFranchu 3 hours ago
You should probably say somewhere that the questions are US-centric. For example, "the death penalty should remain legal" doesn't make sense in places where it isn't.
Comment by FranchuFranchu 3 hours ago
You should probably say somewhere that the questions are US-centric. For example, "the death penalty should remain legal" doesn't make sense in places where it isn't.
A better question might be "should the death penalty be legal", for that reason. After all, it isn't even legal in about half of the USA.
Hey, you are not wrong. That is technically true. So the way I format the questions are always a statement (not a question) otherwise the response is really Yes/No more so than Agree/Disagree. I prefer agree/disagree because it makes the user take a stance more so than answer a question.
I also always word them in the affirmative. X should Y or X was right to Y or X is Y. This is so users understand the flow and are not tripped up by X should "not" Y.
It doesn't always look clean depending on the topic, but it is focused on sentiment of the statement rather than the specifics (the discussion section could be for that).
I should probably add that. I do plan to add some more international statements, but yeah, right now it is very U.S.-centric.