arcfour 5 hours ago

Explains why it reads like AI slop. "CRITICAL BREACH..."

Reply View 3 replies
  • edoceo 4 hours ago

    Can we call slop in two words? I didn't feel that. Is my radar off? /me taps screen

    Reply View 2 replies
    • Uehreka 4 hours ago

      I frequently push back on people being hair-trigger about calling things AI, but even I’ve gotta admit, that’s exactly what Claude code says if you ask it to do a security review and it finds something. I’ve seen this numerous times.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • arcfour 4 hours ago

      I can detect it pretty well, but that was just one example.

      No person starts a summary that way, it's over-the-top and meaningless. I have seen AI do that many times when summarizing something related to security, though. Claude often says "CRITICAL:" or "CRITICAL VULNERABILITY:" or similar, especially when you jam the context window full of junk.

      Reply View 0 replies
cyrusradfar 4 hours ago

Yes, with 128K GH stars. Impressive if true.

Reply View 2 replies
  • jasonjmcghee 4 hours ago

    The account's stars are mostly a "system prompts" collection repo fwiw.

    Reply View 0 replies
  • kristopolous 4 hours ago

    Trying to hustle online and writing high quality software aren't the same

    Reply View 0 replies