mcny 15 hours ago

No, please read the article. No one is saying carriers cant triangulate but carriers shouldn't be able to query the gps on my device and get precise GNSS data.

> Apple made a good step in iOS 26.3 to limit at least one vector of mass surveillance, enabled by having full control of the modem silicon and firmware. They must now allow users to disable GNSS location responses to mobile carriers, and notify the user when such attempts are made to their device.

  • tekla 15 hours ago

    I did read the article fine, thanks for asking.

    The crux of the argument seems to come from this

    > It’s worth noting that GNSS location is never meant to leave your device. GNSS coordinates are calculated entirely passively.

    OK so? The fact that GPS is calculated passively means nothing about the phone being asked what its position is after the fact.

    The article admits this capability is no secret

    > These capabilities are not secrets but somehow they have mostly slid under the radar of the public consciousness.

    If the article just wants to say phones should block that ability, fine. But don't pretend this is some shady BS.

    • kortilla 15 hours ago

      > slid under the radar of the public consciousness.

      It is shady BS, and it’s why this phrase appeared in the article. Just because industry insiders are aware doesn’t mean it’s not shady.

      The same applies to modern cars reporting their information back to manufacturers.

  • benSaiyen 15 hours ago

    Please reread OPs comment

    They never said "triangulate" but read phone for information. Your inner monologue swapped what was written with an already understood technical method.

    And just because access to GPS has never been confirmed publicly before does not mean they previously only relied on tower triangulation.

    Worked for Sprints network team before they bought Nextel. We had access to eeeeverything.

[removed] 15 hours ago
[deleted]
[removed] 15 hours ago
[deleted]
Plasmoid2000ad 15 hours ago

Why would they? It's basic privacy no? Just because I want to pay money to carrier to provide me with data and phone service, I shouldn't have to give up my location from my device. I expect them to know my approximate location from cell tower data.

Generally I'd not expect them actively triangulate my exact location, but I'd realise that's at least possible - but GPS data, wake my phone up, switch on the GPS radio, drain it's battery, send that data back... no. That wouldn't be legal where I live either, let alone expected.

  • nephihaha 14 hours ago

    It's all in the small print or acquired by deception.

  • tekla 15 hours ago

    > but GPS data, wake my phone up, switch on the GPS radio, drain it's battery, send that data back... no. That wouldn't be legal where I live either, let alone expected.

    Where does the article claim this turns on the GPS if off?

    • bmacho 15 hours ago

      It .. probably does turn the GPS on?

      While this is an important question, I don't see the sources mentioning it, what the standards mandate, and how the phones behave.

      For example the wiki article https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radio_resource_location_servic... describes the protocol as using the GPS and not as getting the location info from Android.

colechristensen 15 hours ago

There's a difference in precision between cell tower triangulation and GPS. From 10-100 meters down to 1.

The cell network does not need to know where you are down to the meter and phones have no business giving this information up.