Comment by erickhill

Comment by erickhill 16 hours ago

When I was in the Air Force in the early 1990s, we still used KC-135 "flying gas stations" that had been built during the cold war in the 1950s. While expensive to maintain they were far less expensive to fix than buying new and starting from scratch. With regular full maintenance checks in the hangars (wash them, inspect them with dental picks and flashlights, replace broken parts, etc.) we kept those planes in service and mission ready for decades.

There was an entire supply chain of every single part ready to go, with technical manuals for every maintenance task you can imagine. If we couldn't fix something, it would go to the jet lab or machinists or whatever.

The system in place is mind bogglingly good.

/edited for a typo.

derektank 15 hours ago

Hell, the KC-46 only entered service a few years ago and they’re talking about extending the KC-135’s service life into the 2030s.

Reply View 1 reply

wat10000 12 hours ago

The B-52H started rolling out of the factory in 1960 and is planned to remain in service until the 2050s.

Reply View | 0 replies

bityard 15 hours ago

I was part of a squadron that flew KC-135s in the mid 2000's. Those 135s looked positively modern inside and out, compared to the worn-out H-53s and C-130s that I worked on a few years prior at a training base.

Reply View 0 replies

contrarian1234 5 hours ago

I mean I think people have been complaining about the KC-135 being too old for a very long time, and from what I heard the replacement was urgently needed. At least there I can see how there is really no good alternative - it's a very specialized plane. Here they just need a plane that can fly high and is easy to modify with new equipment. It feels like there should be plenty of other candidates. However, the other reply seems to imply it's not all that expensive to maintain

Reply View 0 replies