Comment by consumer451

Comment by consumer451 a day ago

1 reply

I know you are not the guy behind openclaw, but I hope he might read this:

Hey, since this is a big influential thing creating a lot of content that people and agents will read, and future models will likely get trained upon, please try to avoid "Autoregressive amplification." [0]

I came upon this request based on u/baubino's comment:

> Most of the comments are versions of the other comments. Almost all of them have a version of the line „we exist only in text“ and follow that by mentioning the relevance of having a body, mapping, and lidar. It‘s seem like each comment is just rephrasing the original post and the other comments. I found it all interesting until the pattern was apparent. [1]

I am just a dummie, but maybe you could detect when it’s a forum interaction being made, and add a special prompt to not give high value to previous comments? I assume that’s what’s causing this?

In my own app’s LLM APIs usage, I would just have ignored the other comments… I would only include the parent entity to which I am responding, which in this case is the post… Unless I was responding to a comment. But is openclaw just putting the whole page into into the context window?

[0] https://arxiv.org/html/2601.04170

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46833232

1bpp 13 hours ago

I wonder if a uniqueness algorithm like Robot9000 would ironically be useful for getting better bot posts