Comment by alt187
There's no example because OP has never done this, and never will. People lie on the internet.
There's no example because OP has never done this, and never will. People lie on the internet.
What? People do this all the time. Sometimes manually by invoking another agent with a different model and asking it to review the changes against the original spec. I just setup some reviewer / verifier sub agents in Cursor that I can invoke with a slash command. I use Opus 4.5 as my daily driver, but I have reviewer subagents running Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.2-codex and they each review the plan as well, and then the final implementation against the plan. Both sometimes identify issues, and Opus then integrates that feedback.
It’s not perfect so I still review the code myself, but it helps decrease the number of defects I have to then have the AI correct.
I've never done this because i haven't felt compelled to do this because I want to review my own code but I imagine this works okay and isn't hard to set up by asking Claude to set this up for you...