Comment by kreetx
Because the alledged pretext assumes being able to predict the future.
Because the alledged pretext assumes being able to predict the future.
That's a weird way to frame the perspective of someone whose primary job responsibility is physical aggression. It's also not too hard to jump out of the way of a vehicle that you're focusing on if it starts moving. The argument you're effectively making is that the agent's positioning was entirely non-deliberate, even though he had been dragged by a car previously.
Are you claiming it is impossible for an ICE agent to think "I'm just going to shoot the next person who tries to drive away" or what?