Comment by wan23
A challenge: can you write down a definition of thinking that supports this claim? And then, how is that definition different from what someone who wasn't explicitly trying to exclude LLM-based AI might give?
A challenge: can you write down a definition of thinking that supports this claim? And then, how is that definition different from what someone who wasn't explicitly trying to exclude LLM-based AI might give?
It’s a philosophical question, and I personally have very little interest in philosophing. LLMs are technically limited to what is in their training dataset