Comment by lossolo

Comment by lossolo 2 days ago

7 replies

You should ask yourself this, not me, you're the one who blindly believes what Musk says. He also said he was creating a new political party in the US, how's that going? Did you believe him when he talked about landing people on Mars in 2018? It’s 2026. How is boring company going? etc. I think you're overinterpreting what I wrote and projecting. I'm telling you how the physics works, and the physics is simple here: unless you change the physics or discover some exotic, cheap materials, this is 100% not economically viable today or in the near future.

simianwords 2 days ago

So you have no clue why he's doing it? He's putting money in a thing that will obviously fail.

Either you are way way smarter than him, or he's doing this for some other ulterior motive.

  • lossolo 2 days ago

    You didn't answer my questions. How is The Boring company going? And in this context, you can also ask: "Is he putting money into something that will obviously fail?"

    Also, go back and read how many people who were "smarter than him" there nine years ago:

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14223020

    • simianwords 2 days ago

      Here Bezos, sundar, Jensen all are invested.

      On boring: it’s easy to say in hindsight.

      • lossolo 2 days ago

        You know why I mentioned hydrogen energy earlier? There was a Financial Times article last month titled "Hydrogen dreams meet reality as oil and gas groups abandon projects", which notes that "Almost 60 major low carbon hydrogen projects—including ones backed by BP and ExxonMobil—have been cancelled" because they weren't economically feasible. Space data centers are in the same place today. It's physics. And none of the people you mentioned have invested in this. They may be interested and might research the topic, but that's not the same thing. I've yet to see any plan that explains how they'll replace failed hardware and manage heat while keeping the whole thing economically feasible.