Comment by JKCalhoun
Is this the tactic of pitting cities against one another in a race-to-the-bottom competition that gives public tax money to corporations?
Is this the tactic of pitting cities against one another in a race-to-the-bottom competition that gives public tax money to corporations?
> How is that predation if the people in that city democratically elected the mayor who made that choice?
Find a small town politician, bribe them. Corruption pure and simple with no chance for accountability. The economically strong predate on the economically weak.
For such a massive long term impact, people should vote directly. That's ideal, and its pretty realistic ideal especially with 800 votes which are trivial to count.
If course its not ideal for the company investing. Then the question becomes if rights/wishes of people are above of those of companies. Often, in Europe they are not, and often in US they are, exceptions notwithstanding.
Yes. The company surveyed a number of surrounding locales, looking for a favorable situation. Harwood had the existing Fargo infrastructure and the mayor of Harwood was happy to take a payout. I think the company predation was transparent.