Comment by donkeybeer 3 days ago
Not all warrants are same. Some warrants ICE use don't have legal powers of court issued warrants for example. So yes, its just a piece of nosy Karen paper and you can prevent them entry to your house for example for certain types of warrants.
What warrant it was has no bearing in whether he, not an individual related to any immigration case being investigated has the right to film it.
Most of the warrants being used in the minnesota botch job are the Karen warrants from what can be found anyways.
I'm sure an investigation into this particular case will surface what kind of warrant (or other legal document) they were carrying out and whether whistling along with police carrying out their work was interference or not.
If you know who was going to be captured and how this was only a "Karen" warrant , which doesn't constitute non-interferable police work, post to any source!
You seem to have difficulty with English, maybe its not your main language. What part of the warrant type being immaterial for third parties having a right to film the cops was difficult to understand?
Was this particular warrant like that?