MichaelZuo 2 days ago

So they have no durable principles for deciding who or what to refund… doesnt that make them look even worse…?

Reply View 4 replies
  • necovek a day ago

    Or they do, and two sentences from two different experiences don't tell a full story?

    Reply View 3 replies
    • MichaelZuo 21 hours ago

      Okay “they do” based on what more compelling evidence?

      Its not like the credibility of the two prior HN users are literally zero…

      Reply View 2 replies
      • necovek 19 hours ago

        I am saying there is no evidence either way: they had contrasting experiences and one GP established this means that company has no standardized policies. Maybe they do, maybe they don't — I don't think we can definitively conclude anything.

        Reply View 1 reply
        • MichaelZuo 18 hours ago

          So if you acknowledge the prior claims have more than literally zero credibility… then what’s the issue?

          That I dont equally weigh them with all possible yet-to-be claimed things?

          Reply View 0 replies