Comment by RobotToaster
Comment by RobotToaster 3 days ago
If an employee does something during his employment, even if he wasn't told directly to do it, the company can be held vicariously liable, how is this any different?
Comment by RobotToaster 3 days ago
If an employee does something during his employment, even if he wasn't told directly to do it, the company can be held vicariously liable, how is this any different?
"The company can be held vicariously liable" means that in this analogy, the company represents the human who used AI inappropriately, and the employee represents the AI model that did something it wasn't directly told to do.
Nobody tries to jail the automobile being driven when it hits a pedestrian when on cruise control. The driver is responsible for knowing the limits of the tool and adjusting accordingly.
I agree with you but you can’t jail a gen-ai model, I guess, is where the difference lies?