Comment by Analemma_

Comment by Analemma_ 3 days ago

13 replies

I have a 2022 Model 3, and the hilariously tragic part is that the voice assistant was great and basically never gave me any problems until they shoved Grok into it, whereupon it broke completely. I never use it anymore, they effectively removed a feature from my car.

amluto 3 days ago

Whoa, did Tesla pull an Apple? Siri used to work okay on the iPhone, but once it got LLMed it frequently sits there indefinitely while failing to make any progress on even the simplest commands.

  • wilg 3 days ago

    Apple did an even worse job than you think: they didn't even LLM Siri so I guess it just broke.

FeloniousHam 3 days ago

Counterpoint: I like my Tesla, and I find the AI assistant diverting and useful. I have very little doubt the functionality of the limited on-board voice assistant will be merged into Grok (it's literally on the coming features).

Whether you like this or not, who cares? The pace of improvement in Tesla software compared to any other manufacturer is astonishing, and astonishingly good.

I have no love for the CEO, but my Model Y is a very interesting (and intuitive) car.

  • mvdtnz 3 days ago

    Diverting?

    • dizhn 2 days ago

      In Italian divertente is entertaining. Parent probably speaks a Romance language and got hit by a "false friend".

      • BobaFloutist 2 days ago

        That's actually a valid (of old fashioned) usage in English too, it's just a bit weird to value in a voice assistant for your car.

jgillette 2 days ago

Do a quick press of the voice button and the old voice control activate; if you hold it down or press too long, it uses the grok AI which can't do anything (and I never use).

secabeen 3 days ago

I have an older X, and I'm kind of happy that the AP and Infotainment hardware in it is largely deprecated, and they are unlikely to be able to shove Grok crap into it. It will stay largely the same for the life of the car.

array_key_first 3 days ago

This is part of the reason why I believe cars should delegate as much software functionality to your phone as possible. Phones have good voice assistants and they will get better, same with GPS and music. Just let the phone do it. Plus, when the software is out of support you don't have to buy a new car.

  • direwolf20 2 days ago

    What if I don't have my phone, or if someone else drives the car?

    • array_key_first 2 days ago

      These are niche enough use cases I don't think they're worth bothering about.

      I wouldn't dump millions into a custom GPS solution for that 1 time out of 1 million someone drives a car without a smartphone. Especially when that GPS system is guaranteed to be worse than Google maps and not as well supported.

      If someone else drives your car they can connect their phone. Which is an improvement, because now they have THEIR music and navigation. See, it comes with personalization out of the box and automatically!

      • direwolf20 2 days ago

        It should be impossible to drive a car without a phone?

        • array_key_first 14 hours ago

          No it should definitely be possible, I just don't think it's worth while creating a subpar and poorly-supported GPS system when phones exist. Especially when said system is forced over phones, which often happens because companies want to promote their own shit. As if their shit don't stink, when really it's the smelliest.

          We don't need 1 million different applications that we have to try to integrate together. Just let me connect my messages, my GPS, my music player, even my calendar. Personally, I could give a rat's ass how fancy Tesla's interface is or GM's. It will always, always be second best to what's available on modern smartphones.