You're the one making a political argument by doing a whataboutism that attempts to negate the failings of this administration. Which you're not even doing correctly because by every measure the previous administration was drastically more competent by looking at the qualifications of the people who filled their posts.
What do you think of https://electiontruthalliance.org/ ? I haven’t deeply read their stuff, and I’m not really qualified to evaluate their statistics, but it seems like there are concerns worth following.
Is your position that the 2024 election, despite having a foreign power intercept the phone communications of both campaigns (confirmed and on record), had no integrity compromises?
What do you consider a compromise of integrity if not a hacking of political campaigns?
Also, please clarify whether the 2016 DNC hack is an exemption to your prior answer so I can weigh your bias.
Why don't you enlighten us since you seem to know so much about the topic? I know that none of the people who are experts at detecting the statistical artifacts that appears during voting roll have questioned the integrity of the US election.
In fact the only people questioning it are conspirancy-minded people who don't know that there are robust methodologies to detect election fraud.
Can you explain how leaking the phone metadata of 80% of Americans and compromising the integrity of the 2024 election campaign's private comms is better OpSec than a single leak?
It's the worst U.S. government leak of all time, by far.