Comment by kreetx
Well, you argue for interference with law enforcement. I don't see how that helps "the cause", it also puts the participants in danger. I.e, the few deaths that have already occurred.
Well, you argue for interference with law enforcement. I don't see how that helps "the cause", it also puts the participants in danger. I.e, the few deaths that have already occurred.
Is this assesment wrong https://youtu.be/QePoawDA_48?si=0mr-lMR_lIRoBDA_
First, it is the duty of law enforcement to recognize a situation that can and should be de-escalated. The public is not an cannot be responsible for that, and it doesn't justify murder if they aren't. "Interference", while in my opinion very warranted here, doesn't constitute an imminent life threat to Law enforcement nor the public, and it is not permissible for them to use lethal force in that situation. Aside from killing wantonly and happily ("fucking bitch"), law enforcement in this case is acting illegally on administrative warrants, violating the Constitution to enter houses they do not have legal warrants for, being masked and unidentifiable (and thus unaccountable for their actions to the public) when they commit attrocities in the public view (why would a legitimate police force need to hide its face) and generally being a public menace. It is your civic duty and a proud American tradition to stand up to lawless police forces.