Comment by kakacik

Comment by kakacik 3 days ago

9 replies

Yes and no. Tons of situations where this is simply not possible, whole traffic goes full allowed speed next to row of parked cars. If somebody unexpectedly pops up distracted, its a tragedy guaranteed regardless of driver's skills and experience.

In low traffic of course it can be different. But its unrealistic to expect anybody to drive in expectation that behind every single car passed there may be a child jumping right in front of the car. That can be easily thousands of cars, every day, whole life. Impossible.

We don't read about 99.9% of the cases where even semi decent driver can handle it safely, but rare cases make the news.

jsrozner 3 days ago

I slow down considerably near parked cars. And I try to slow down much earlier approaching intersections where there are parked cars blocking my view of cross walk entries. I need to be able to come to full stop earlier than intersection if there happens to be a pedestrian there.

JKCalhoun 3 days ago

I kind of drive that way. I slow down, move as far away in my lane from the parked cars as possible. It's certainly what I would expect from a machine that would claim to be as good as the best human driver.

  • jobs_throwaway 3 days ago

    > a machine that would claim to be as good as the best human driver.

    Does Waymo claim that? If so I haven't seen it. That should of course be the goal, but "better than the average human driver" should be the bar.

    • JKCalhoun 3 days ago

      If they don't clim that, why would I be interested in their tech?

      • aembleton 3 days ago

        Because I'm only an average driver. Definitely not the best and have done no advanced driver training.

      • jobs_throwaway 2 days ago

        Because we can reduce crashes and fatalities without Waymo being Max Verstappen

      • Aloisius 3 days ago

        Because replacing average drivers with a better than average one would save lives.