defrost 3 days ago

* Fishing's not catching,

* I just pulled up a family video of several kids, mine, my siblings, friends, making commercial marbles for sale pulling glass from a furnace and rolling them on a bench, using optic moulds, canes for decoration, etc .. at the age of five.

Sure, we weren't running them like chimney sweeps or coal mine donkeys 24/7 - that's what they wanted to do for pocket money - make their own, how ever many, and sell them.

  • rubzah 3 days ago

    > Fishing's not catching

    Sounds like something from an MLM seminar. "Telling's not selling!"

  • nephihaha 3 days ago

    I doubt she was doing much in this direction until at least the age of eleven and even then...

    • defrost 3 days ago

      I can't say either way, having never met her.

      I can say that Sandy over the road (now deceased, made it to 94) was hitching bullocks to sled a water tank to a spring and back every morning setting out at 4am from the age of five or so - both his parents died of influenza just a few years later.

      My own father, (still alive, born 1935) was shooting and trapping rabbits at that age to feed the family.

    • barry-cotter 3 days ago

      Depressing to realise that soon most people will not even have second hand experience with children being useful.

    • cucumber3732842 3 days ago

      In the days before OSHA there was a lot of stuff on a lobster boat an 8yo can be tasked with.

    • [removed] 3 days ago
      [deleted]
tokai 3 days ago

She started working at the age of 8. Which we both know from reading the article.

  • nephihaha 3 days ago

    I doubt she could do much at eight either. Maybe tie some knots.

    • quesera 3 days ago

      There are many small tasks to be performed on a lobstering boat, especially back in 1929. An 8 yo could absolutely perform many of them.

      But sure, it's highly likely that she headed out with a parent or older sibling initially. This doesn't seem controversial or worth making quibbly points over.

jpk2f2 3 days ago

From 8 to 105...97 years. I'd say that qualifies as "almost a century".

simonw 3 days ago

Presumably that's why they said "almost a century" and not just "a century".