Comment by TimorousBestie

Comment by TimorousBestie 4 days ago

9 replies

An interesting question.

Assuming the FAA has the authority to enforce ADSB requirements (an open question post-Chevron), I can’t find any regulation saying non-aircrafts cannot transmit ADSB. Only ones saying aircrafts in certain categories must.

There’s probably some non-interference requirement somewhere (FCC spectrum licensing perhaps), but I’m not seeing it immediately.

All this is in the hypothetical that RF was transmitted, which as others point out it probably wasn’t.

tjohns 4 days ago

It would be under the FCC regs, not the FAA regs.

Whatever transmitter you're using would not be type-accepted for operation on the 1080 MHz or 978 MHz band. (47 USC § 301)

Additionally, RF operation with the intent of willful interference is inherently illegal. (47 USC § 333)

  • fc417fc802 4 days ago

    What if you removed a genuine ADS-B unit from a plane and installed it in your vehicle?

    Also does impersonation necessarily qualify as interference? Naively, I'd expect interference to refer to jamming.

[removed] 4 days ago
[deleted]
15155 4 days ago

(Assuming this were actually RF)

This is easily-prosecutable willful interference or possibly aircraft sabotage: ADS-B operates in licensed bands and uses an already highly-contended modulation scheme and transmission protocol.

  • esseph 4 days ago

    No reason to believe RF when you can just upload whatever data you want

  • fragmede 4 days ago

    They'll probably try and make a case of wire fraud and CFAA as the usual go tos if it wasn't in RF.

    • habinero 3 days ago

      "Wire fraud" means financial fraud, not "sending data over wires".