Comment by spacechild1

Comment by spacechild1 4 days ago

6 replies

Again, why did you claim that Alex' gun went off as if that was a fact?

> It's just that the first one likely caused the rest of it as the surrounding officers didn't know who was shooting.

No need to speculate. If you watch https://youtu.be/i8kFcK-X-vQ?t=108 you will see that the first agent shoots Alex in the back one time and another three times while they all move away. Note that Alex has been restrained the whole time. One second later, you hear 6 more shots. This is where the second agent got involved. At this point, Alex has already been lying on the ground.

> because "gun" was yelled, would that turn this into anything else than an accident?

At best this was an accident, but even then it was the agents fault for misinterpreting the situation or the DHS's fault for deploying badly trained agents. (Hearing the words "Gun!" does not give officers the permit to shoot, unless they perceive an imminent threat to their or someone else's life!) However, if you watch the video above, you can see that an agent removes Alex' gun right in front of the agent who fires the first shots. There are lots of open questions.

> The best way to appear not to have a gun, nor appear dangerous at all, is not bring a gun to a protest.

The act of conceiled carrying alone does not make you a threat. Alex never behaved in a threatening way.

Instead of putting the blame solely on Alex, maybe ask yourself what the agents could have done to deescalate the situation, what kind of people the DHS recruits as ICE agents and if their training is appropriate for urban policing.

kreetx 4 days ago

> Again, why did you claim that Alex' gun went off as if that was a fact?

This seems to be what people suspect. It's less likely that an officers own gun goes off as they are familiar with it.

I don't put blame on Alex, solely (read!). But the ill meaning callouts of ICE being this and that, occupation, isn't correct either. I don't think you people in the US have actually lived under an occupation, so these words are easy to use.

Regarding being threatening: well, if you carry a gun to a protest and engage physically with an officer (subjectively and to me) is threatening. It also seemed threatening to the shooting officers.

  • spacechild1 3 days ago

    > This seems to be what people suspect.

    Who? Not even the DHS people claim this! And why did you initially present it as a fact?

    > It's less likely that an officers own gun goes off as they are familiar with it.

    Again, you can clearly see/hear on the video that the agent fires the first shot. No gun went off. Why do you make stuff up?

    > It also seemed threatening to the shooting officers.

    I very much doubt it. At the best the agents were just badly trained and did not know how to handle someone who carries a gun (in a state that allows conceiled carrying).

    • kreetx 3 days ago

      I presented it initially because this has been what people think: https://youtu.be/QePoawDA_48?si=0mr-lMR_lIRoBDA_ There are many more people opining this, both as these more produced videos to simple social media postings. I still do present you the opinion that likely the confiscated gun went off which started the rest of the shooting.

      The first shot is not "clearly seen" as far as I can tell.

      If Pretti, and the first fired shot, didn't seem threatening then the shooting wouldn't have happened..

      I'm happy that you know how law enforcement works, how to behave in critical situations and that it actually is possible to have perfect awareness of any situation. If you are this good, I'd suggest to join the force yourself, as you have a clear advantage in doing that kind of work.

      This video ties my non-professional opinion well into the US legal fabric https://youtu.be/QePoawDA_48?si=0mr-lMR_lIRoBDA_.

      • spacechild1 3 days ago

        > I presented it initially because this has been what people think:

        Maybe in some MAGA podcast circles. This has never been more than pure speculation. Again, why did you present it as a fact?

        Let's assume the gun went off. I'm sure the person holding that gun would have noticed that. Why wasn't this reported, especially as it would support their case? This just doesn't make any sense at all.

        > The first shot is not "clearly seen" as far as I can tell.

        It very much is. Did you even watch the video I've linked? It shows the very moment the first shot is being fired. Are you seriously claiming it is not the agent who is firing that shot? Again, not even the DHS is disputing that the agent fired the first shot.

        Stop making a fool of yourself.