Comment by hcknwscommenter

I agree with your overall point. But I find it odd that you consider sales taxes to be the "fairest". Similarly, I find it odd that you put "progressive" taxes in some tension with "fair" taxes. Folks in the highest income range arguably benefit the most from govt services (e.g., infrastructure, defense, R&D, rule of law). They also have a much higher ability to pay well beyond basic survival needs. And, they can reduce sales tax burden by saving versus consuming, a choice that is not available to lower-income.

JKCalhoun 4 days ago

I agree that a regressive tax like sales tax is not "fair" at all.

I had a coworker that argued for a flat tax—considered that fair. I explained that anything less than a progressive tax was going to make the poor pay more and the wealthy pay less. Really, that's fair?

You should be so lucky to have enough that you're in the highest tax bracket.

Reply View 9 replies

vunderba 4 days ago

Yeah, I can't imagine somebody arguing in good faith that a flat tax is fair unless they are completely oblivious to the concept of the diminishing marginal utility of income.

Reply View | 5 replies
- nerdsniper 4 days ago
  
  A relatively high 'flat tax' might be palatable to the electorate as long as the first $85,000, give or take, was completely tax-free. People would only have to contribute once their own needs are met and they actually have something left over to contribute.
  
  Reply View | 4 replies
  
  toomuchtodo 4 days ago
  
  That’s progressive taxes. Consider that roughly the bottom 60% of Americans have no federal income tax liability, simply because they do not make enough. That 60% cannot meet their basic needs on their incomes, very roughly speaking. Any increase of taxes on them would be regressive.
  
  Reply View | 3 replies
seanmcdirmid 3 days ago

Mississippi taxes groceries and has a flat income tax (well, it has a deduction at least). That state is just never going to get better.

Reply View | 0 replies
michtzik 4 days ago

> I explained that anything less than a progressive tax was going to make the poor pay more and the wealthy pay less.
Here's a formally-verified proof in Lean that with a flat tax, if you have more income, then you pay more tax: https://live.lean-lang.org/#codez=JYWwDg9gTgLgBAWQIYwBYBtgCM...
The theorem uses one important assumption: that the flat tax rate is positive.

Reply View | 1 reply
- necovek 4 days ago
  
  I believe everybody understands that a percentage means exactly that.
  But if you account for minimum living expenses M, if you are under M, 30% of M is "more" than if you are at 10x M for the quality of your life. What scheme is "fair" is harder to figure out, though.
  Yes, I object to that type of language too, but let's not ignore the context.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies