Comment by fc417fc802

Comment by fc417fc802 5 days ago

0 replies

You originally asked what the value proposition for a regular (non-corporate) user was. Then you raised some objections to my answer (or at least so I thought).

Granted these technologies can also be abused. But that involves running third party binaries that require SGX or other DRM measures before they will unlock or decrypt content or etc. Or querying a security element to learn who signed the image that was originally booted. Devices that support those things are already widespread. I don't think that's what this project is supposed to be. (Although I could always be wrong. There's almost no detail provided.)