Comment by reconnecting

Comment by reconnecting 5 days ago

92 replies

Apple forced me to switch to Linux!

Linux should consider paying Microsoft and Apple for new customers. Perhaps the customer acquisition funnel is quite long, at least it took 20 years of using Apple in my case before switching to Debian (Xfce), but it was worth it!

ecshafer 5 days ago

As a regular linux user for the last 20 years, who had used windows for games for about 25 of the last 30 years. When I had gotten a macbook pro for work in a company that was all apple there were three things that stood out: The M processors are amazing, the apple hardware is really good, and mac os is absolutely awful. I have no idea how people use mac.

  • al_borland 5 days ago

    > mac os is absolutely awful. I have no idea how people use mac.

    I hear this from a lot of people when they get their first Mac. When they get specific about what their issues are, it tends to be that macOS doesn't do a thing how they are used to doing it, which is more of a learning curve issue, or rigid thinking. Apple software can be quite opinionated, those who fight against those opinions tend to have a hard time. This is true of any opinionated software.

    • BeetleB 4 days ago

      > Apple software can be quite opinionated, those who fight against those opinions tend to have a hard time. This is true of any opinionated software.

      And this is why many like me prefer Linux. We have our own opinions, and Linux enables us to enforce our opinions.

      I've been a Linux guy for 25 years, and used Windows at work for the last 15. I now have to use MacOS at work.

      I miss Windows. It wasn't totally better, but I managed to overcome most Windows headaches with workarounds. I haven't found the alternatives yet to MacOS.

      From my perspective, both Windows and MacOS suck - but in different ways. I think the problem many Linux folks have with MacOS is that it is the "uncanny valley" of Linux. You get happy that you can use your usual UNIX flows, and then you find out that you can't.

      I really want a good tiling window manager. I have yet to find one on MacOS that has the features AwesomeWM have.

      It really sucks not being able to rebind keys to use Ctrl instead of Cmd in many apps. For basic tasks (opening/closing browser tabs), I have to use one set of keys in the daytime (at work), and another at night (at home). Why won't MacOS let me change them?

      • nout 4 days ago

        I got used to the Mac keyboard layout and I think it makes more sense - I now remap all Linux (using keyd) to actually use the Mac layout. The main thing that I like is that it's more ergonomic for me to press command + something with my thumb, than it is to press control + something with my little finger. So command+c, command+v, command+Tab, command+`... are all easily reachable when my fingers are still in the writing letters position, just slightly moved to the left.

      • eigencoder 4 days ago

        MacOS lets you rebind Caps Lock, Ctrl, Option, Command, and the Globe/fn key in Settings > Keyboard > Keyboard shortcuts... > Modifier Keys. Does that not work for you?

      • morshu9001 4 days ago

        Most of the stuff isn't really personal preference, more like being temporarily used to a different way.

        Btw search "modifier keys" in Mac sysprefs if you want to rebind command to control. I'm also sick of using separate shortcuts at work, but the other way around, gonna rebind Ubuntu.

        • Hard_Space 4 days ago

          I use Karabinier to remap keys. Mac OS makes you work hard to enable it the first time, though.

    • ecshafer 4 days ago

      I can give you a few examples:

      Packages are not done well compared to linux. Brew is a poor replacement. It feels like the terminal and everything involved is constantly out of date.

      The OS just has a lot of weird things, like the ribbon at the bottom taking up so much space. When I made is smaller and hidden except on mouse over it was incredibly rough.

      Window management is decades behind windows or linux. It doesn't like maximizing windows and doesn't make partitioning screen space easy. I had to download a third party app to make it better, which was still worse than windows even in windows 7, and miles worse than linux with i3.

      Mac has a lot of rough spots. I have two external monitors and occasionally after updates one monitor would be fuzzy or different resolutions, and it wouldn't go back until the next update.

      • kevinrineer 4 days ago

        I found myself really frustrated trying to use MacOS at work, because I'm a heavy user of virtual desktops. Turns out, I couldn't find a way to disable animations to switch between virtual desktops on MacOS. If there is a way, I'd be surprised.

        Shortening the animation to minimum was not sufficient for my preference.

      • subjectsigma 4 days ago

        When did you use a Mac last, 2010?

        You can run nix on macOS now. You can also drag windows into corners or edges to tile them, it is almost exactly like Windows 7 or 10. You can even have tiling window managers on macOS that emulate i3.

        Your complaints with the dock seem like a personal choice... I like the dock behavior but if you don't, probably not a lot that will fix that, it will always suck.

        Sad to report that external monitor support is still terrible.

    • ep103 5 days ago

      MacOs is extraordinarily opinionated about how everything should work and frequently attempt to predict your workflow.

      Linux/Windows (historically) were straightforawrd, each tool did exactly what it said it would do, and it was up to you to learn how to use the tools available.

      On linux/windows, if a button was "capture image", it would just capture the image on the screen. On a mac a "capture image" button could do anything from displaying the image on the screen, to saving it in a photos folder, to saving and syncing it to an iCloud account. Whatever the apple PM decided the most common use case was, and god help you if you want to do something different.

      If you've been in the mac ecosystem for a while, you've grown used to this and don't notice any longer. You may even occasionally express happiness when a function does something unexpected and helpful!

      If you're coming from anywhere else, its unbelievably painful.

      • al_borland 4 days ago

        I’d frame it slightly differently.

        With Linux/Windows you’re supplied with a toolbox and from that toolbox you’re expected to cobble together a workflow that works for you and maintain it.

        I spent a significant amount of time trying to learn Tasks inside of Outlook and come up with a system that would make it remotely useful. I failed repeatedly. They eventually bought Wunderlist and replaced it with that, which still has some rough edges (last I tried) due to the legacy Outlook Tasks integration.

        Apple, more often than not, is looking to identify a problem and give an opinionated solution on how to handle it. If you’re ok with their solution, great, problem solved. If you’re not, you end up either fighting with the Apple tools or finding a 3rd party toolbox style app that lets you cobble together a workflow. I found just going with the opinionated solution removes a lot of needless stress from my life. There are some places I do go 3rd party, but I reevaluate often to ask if I really need these things and if they’re worth the trouble.

        It ends up being a question of what my goals are with the computer. Am I looking to work on the operating system and apps to tune them to exactly what I want, or am I just looking for the system to fade into the background so I can do other things. When I was younger, I found tweaking and playing with everything to be a bit of a hobby. These days, I just want to do what I need to get done and move on with my life.

    • eviks 4 days ago

      > This is true of any opinionated software.

      No, good opinions exist, some of them include respect for user customization so that you can tweak your way out of pain.

      > or rigid thinking.

      Indeed, it's the users who are awful!

    • ars 4 days ago

      Home/End don't work correctly (external keyboard).

      Cmd-Tab switching between applications instead of windows is utterly stupid. (Yes I know there is some magic keystroke that will do it, but who even wants the standard behavior? Like why even do that?)

      If there is a window under another window, and you click on something in it, the OS will ignore the click, it will just activate the window.

      So now you have to click twice, except what if it's actually active? So now you have to always check if a window is active - which is harder than necessary because of how Macs have the toolbar on top, not near the actual window. (This is especially bad when you have two monitors.)

      The toolbar is far from the window, leading to extra mouse movements.

      There is no maximize button, instead it's a full screen button.

      If you manage to get a window off-screen, there's almost no way to get it back (you have to pick tile windows or something like that to make the mac move it). If you do show all windows, and click on it, nothing obvious happens.

      I'm trying to add the screenshot app to the launch bar - I can't, I click on Launchpad and find it, but you can't right click on any of the icons in there to do anything with them.

      The finder is an utter disaster - I can not for the life of me figure out how to go up one level in a directory. It's like finder is trying very hard to pretend there's no such thing as directories.

      If you have two monitors you can't have an app halfway across both of them, it's always on one of the order.

      If I move an app to the bottom right corner the OS will "helpfully" move it back up, even though I moved it down. (This is especially funny when you realize it frequently manages to place windows off screen - why can't it be helpful then?)

      When you drag a window sometimes you get this white outline that will resize the window for your screen - I have yet to figure out when this activates and when it doesn't.

      When you drag a window from a larger monitor to a small one, it will resize it - sometime. But despite that it manages to place the window offset - so it's the right size, but like 40 pixels to the left.

      Every single time I reboot, if I have to unplug my external monitor, and keyboard, login, then plug them back in. Otherwise it refuses to talk to them.

      • subjectsigma 4 days ago

        > Every single time I reboot, if I have to unplug my external monitor, and keyboard, login, then plug them back in. Otherwise it refuses to talk to them.

        HOLY SHIT, my work Mac does this all the time and my personal Mac does not, I cannot for the life of me figure out why, nobody I have talked to understands it, it drives me absolutely insane.

        Everything else in your post is either a personal preference and/or not a problem for my workflow

      • vladvasiliu 4 days ago

        I hate mac os window management as much as the next guy, but I do find that it's much easier to tell which window is actually active than on newer versions of windows where all windows look the same. Hell, I've typed my password in the wrong window more times than I can count, because even though the window which just appeared was on top, had a blinking cursor and everything, it wasn't active. This even happened with the UAC prompt, but I think it's been fixed now.

        I also like the first click in a window to not be passed through. I don't want to have to make sure I'm not clicking on some active part which will immediately have an unwanted effect. I've actually configured my Linux WM to behave that way. It still passes through the scroll wheel, though.

        > The finder is an utter disaster - I can not for the life of me figure out how to go up one level in a directory. It's like finder is trying very hard to pretend there's no such thing as directories.

        You can enable a clickable bread-crumb panel somewhere. Also, cmd+up. cmd+down goes down one level, instead of enter. This was very frustrating to me at first.

        > I'm trying to add the screenshot app to the launch bar - I can't, I click on Launchpad and find it, but you can't right click on any of the icons in there to do anything with them.

        Never tried to do that, but I loved that there were system-wide shortcuts to access it, with an easy switch between modes (cmd+shift+3/4 for screen / area if memory serves).

        > Every single time I reboot, if I have to unplug my external monitor, and keyboard, login, then plug them back in. Otherwise it refuses to talk to them.

        On Windows, I have the opposite problem, kind of. It only detects my 5k external screen as such if it's plugged in when booting up. Unplug while it's running, or sleep/wake the laptop and it's gone. Linux, again, works fine.

      • al_borland 4 days ago

        > Home/End don't work correctly (external keyboard).

        macOS tends to use the arrow keys for this, with various modifiers. Command + the arrow moves to the start or end of things (documents or lines), Option will be at the word or line level. Adding Shift to either of those will highlight those regions.

        > Cmd-Tab switching between applications instead of windows is utterly stupid.

        I've never been a cmd-tab user, so I don't notice thins. Once Exposé (now Mission Control) came out, I just stuck with that. I bind it to an extra button on my mouse.

        > The toolbar is far from the window, leading to extra mouse movements.

        The reason for this dates back to the original design of the Lisa. Bill Atkinson explains it in this video. It's a trade off between having issues with menus when windows are small, and having to move more. I believe this is why they added mouse acceleration, so no matter where you were, you could get up to the menus fairly quickly.

        https://youtu.be/Qg0mHFcB510?si=yc0uCunQiMufGc75&t=416

        > There is no maximize button, instead it's a full screen button.

        They're starting to get better on this. The full screen button has a menu to do many things, and one of them is to maximize (they call it Fill). You can also just drag the window to the top edge to maximize it, like Aerosnap on Windows.

        > If you manage to get a window off-screen, there's almost no way to get it back

        Windows > Center, will bring the active window to the center of the screen.

        > I click on Launchpad and find it, but you can't right click on any of the icons in there to do anything with them.

        You can drag icons from LaunchPad to the Dock to add them. They'll still be where they were in LaunchPad, but now also in the Dock for quick access. LaunchPad is gone in macOS 26 though, so you can either right-click it in the Dock while it's there to tell it to keep in there (or just drag it over to the left and it will remember it)... or find it in Finder /Applications/Utilities/Screenshot

        > I can not for the life of me figure out how to go up one level in a directory.

        I usually show the Path Bar whenever I get a new Mac. In Finder, View > Show Path Bar. This shows your path at the bottom of the Finder window. You can click on any parent directory to go to it.

        If you don't want to do that, or want another way, right-click the folder name at the top of the Finder window. This will show you a dropdown menu of all the parent directories, pick however far you want to go up the tree.

        > If you have two monitors you can't have an app halfway across both of them, it's always on one of the order.

        This one annoys me a bit too, and can lead to that window off-screen thing you mentioned earlier. It's one of the reason I went with a large primary monitor instead of having 4 external displays, like I had before.

        > If I move an app to the bottom right corner the OS will "helpfully" move it back up

        I think this has to do with the horizontal area the Dock is on being "protected" for lack of a better word, so nothing gets trapped behind the Dock. I agree, that having it do this for off-screen windows would be nice.

        > When you drag a window sometimes you get this white outline that will resize the window for your screen

        This is what I mentioned earlier to maximize. It works pretty much like on Windows. It activates not when the window hits an edge, but when your mouse cursor that is holding a window hits an edge.

        Top edge: Maximize Side edge: Half the screen Corner: 1/4 of the screen

        By default there will be gaps between these tiled windows, which some people don't like. You can remove the gaps in the Settings.

        > When you drag a window from a larger monitor to a small one, it will resize it

        I think this has to do with scaling of the monitors, or just that one monitor is dramatically smaller. My main setup is a laptop + a large monitor. The windows on my main display are bigger than the entire laptop screen, so it makes them smaller so they fit.

        > Every single time I reboot, if I have to unplug my external monitor, and keyboard, login, then plug them back in. Otherwise it refuses to talk to them.

        On my work setup I use an CalDigit dock and I occasionally have this happen after a big upgrade. I don't have to disconnect everything, I just have to login using my laptop, then trust the dock.

        On my home setup, I use my monitor as the dock for my mouse and keyboard. With this, every time I reboot I need to login with the laptop and then approve the monitor as the dock for the other things to work. I don't have to unplug/replug anything (thankfully).

        I tried looking into this once or twice. People online talked about various trust settings, but nothing seemed to stick. I really only reboot when there is an update, so it's pretty infrequent. If I was rebooting daily I'm sure it would drive me insane, to the point where I'd stop using the monitor as a dock.

    • int_19h 4 days ago

      I switched to Mac as my primary two years ago and I'm still finding myself frustrated at the software a lot.

      It's not just that it's opinionated - that's fine. It's that those opinions are often just poor UX.

    • stackedinserter 4 days ago

      Not just this. I'm linux/macos user since early 2000's and still sometimes hate macos because they have very annoying bugs that are never fixed, and annoying corpo decisions.

      E.g. it keeps opening Music app whenever I connect bluetooth earbuds. I can't delete Music app, it just keeps popping up with imbecile message about "user is not logged in" or something. I run a script that monitors that Music.app is running and kills-9 it.

      Or blinking desktop background issue, that's been there for years, accumulated many support threads, and still not fixed.

      Random services like coreaudiod that suddenly start consuming 100% CPU for no apparent reason.

      Macbook throttling (thanks God, gone with M cpu's)

      I can keep going but my point is macos has legit problems that can't be simply shrugged off with "they just hold it the wrong way".

      Like any other mass product tbh, except rare ideal products like Factorio game or sqlite.

      • al_borland 4 days ago

        I haven't had that Bluetooth issue (but I haven't tried connecting my non-airpods to my mac).

        Have you tried this? I saw it as a fix over on Reddit.

        Privacy & Security > Bluetooth > Click the + > Add Music from Applications > Toggle to disabled

        (This is insane to have to do, but better than running a script to monitor for it and kill it)

    • 3form 4 days ago

      There's something to it.

      On that note, is there any GUI tool that allows me to browse my zip archives without unpacking them, and is also free?

  • manuelmoreale 5 days ago

    > and mac os is absolutely awful. I have no idea how people use Mac.

    Not sure about other people, but in my case I spend 99% of the time using software made by 3rd parties so my exposure to the OS is very limited.

    Latest OS is making life miserable though, compared to all the previous releases.

  • AdamN 5 days ago

    Anything in particular? I get that it takes some tweaking but so does Linux. The biggest thing that you'll probably never get the way you want is window tiling - it's my personal bugaboo with MacOS. Maybe there's a way to get what I want ...

    • AaronM 5 days ago

      For me, the biggest pain point is the way it decides which window to bring to the front. If I minimize a window, and then click on the application in the bar, it won't show the window just minimized, instead it always seems to show the older window. Really annoying when using an app with many windows

      • figers 5 days ago

        right click on the app and select the window you want...

        • vladvasiliu 4 days ago

          right, but if you cmd-tab, it brings up ALL the windows: say you had multiple browser windows open, and only want to go back to the one you just used before (think reading some docs while coding).

    • chezelenkoooo 5 days ago

      There's a couple but nothing I've found at the level of i3 or whatever the hyprland equivalent is.

    • lastdong 4 days ago

      “I get that it takes some tweaking (MacOS)” How times have changed, it used to be as intuitive as drinking water.

    • ecshafer 4 days ago

      Window wiling is a big one for me. I have tried the third party options, and nothing compares to i3.

    • Carrok 5 days ago

      There are an absolute ton of very capable tiling window managers for macOS, posted here frequently. From yabi to aerospace to fully programmable ones like hammerspoon. A quick search will turn up plenty more. I would be shocked if none of them meet your needs.

      • morshu9001 4 days ago

        Shouldn't need to install third party stuff for such a basic feature. One more thing that will possibly break with updates or not play nice with something.

    • ikidd 5 days ago

      Fucking Finder. What a colossal dumpster fire. It drags that entire OS down.

      • juuular 5 days ago

        Better than Windows Explorer

  • 8bitsrule 4 days ago

    Interesting. My experience over a decade was that (expensive) Apple hardware was unreliable or poorly designed ... from the IIsi to the iMac. One exception: the murdered Power clone was great. The iMac vertical screen-stripe fiasco (affected hundreds of users within the warranty period, before they shut down the forum, then took years to respond to) was capped with a hard-drive fail after a year. My 'never again' still in effect 15 years later.

    My home-made AMD tower is in its 6th year (running Linux) with no, zero, fails.

  • reconnecting 5 days ago

    Man, we didn't have this all along.

    Six years ago everything was stable and solid, but Apple's board of directors seems to have decided that new Mac users can't handle a computer interface anymore and started merging it with mobile OS interfaces. And the result is absolutely terrible.

    • steve1977 4 days ago

      They also decided that they have to capture React devs and everything should use a declarative UI, which has brought us the wonderful new Systems Settings.

  • juuular 5 days ago

    Windows is such garbage, I can't understand how you think MacOS is worse lol. It's just Unix. Linux is definitely better than both though

    • 3form 4 days ago

      They didn't say they think macOS is worse, though.

    • ecshafer 4 days ago

      Windows is absolute garbage, I agree. But the application windows behave normally, maximize when I want them, will take half a screen, quarter screen, etc. with just a quick hotkey. Mac doesn't have that extremely basic functionality without a 3rd party extension, which is absurd. But I don't use windows other than if my work gives me one, I am purely linux otherwise.

  • kaydub 4 days ago

    > I have no idea how people use mac.

    Meh, it has a terminal. Good enough for me. It's worth putting up with MacOS for the hardware.

stuartjohnson12 5 days ago

It's only fair that Linux should pay 10% of the license fee for their software to Microsoft in exchange

geophile 4 days ago

For a long time, I had a MBP (this is in Intel days), with a Linux VM. It was like a reverse mullet, party in front (multimedia), work in back (dev).

And then:

    - Butterfly keyboard
    - Touchbar
    - M-series CPUs, which, while technically awesome, did not allow for Linux VMs.
So I switched to System76/Linux (Pop OS) and that has been wonderful, not to mention, much cheaper.
  • reconnecting 4 days ago

    - No esc

    • bnchrch 4 days ago

      See I'm a ends justify the means guy:

      The more people forced into the beautiful world of capslock is escape the better!

      • reconnecting 4 days ago

        Your website has stained my screen. lol

        background-image: radial-gradient(circle at 12% 24%, var(--text-primary) 1.5px, transparent 1.5px),

        radial-gradient(circle at 73% 67%, var(--text-primary) 1px, transparent 1px),

        radial-gradient(circle at 41% 92%, var(--text-primary) 1.2px, transparent 1.2px),

        radial-gradient(circle at 89% 15%, var(--text-primary) 1px, transparent 1px);

zabzonk 5 days ago

> Linux should consider paying Microsoft and Apple

Who or what is the "Linux" entity in this context?

  • breezykoi 5 days ago

    Joking aside, I often hear people say "they should" when talking about GNU/Linux (for example: "they should just standardize on one audio stack"), as if there were a central authority making those decisions. What many don't realize is that with FOSS comes freedom of choice... and inevitably, an abundance of choice. That diversity isn't a flaw, it's a consequence of how the ecosystem works.

    • morshu9001 4 days ago

      There's free choice for those OSes to use different kernels, but they don't, they all use the same Linux (rather than say BSD). There's a lot of advantage in getting aligned on things, even though anyone can choose not to.

      • breezykoi 4 days ago

        It is true that Linux-based distributions have this thing in common: the Linux kernel. There have been some GNU/Hurd variants though...

  • morshu9001 4 days ago

    I guess Linus Torvalds and co? First they'd need to standardize a Linux desktop OS.

  • avaer 5 days ago

    Also who is paying "Linux" and for what?

    Maybe the answer ends up being Valve.

    • breezykoi 4 days ago

      Well at least Microsoft is a platinum member of the Linux Foundation for many years...

rafaelmn 5 days ago

As much as I love the idea of moving to Linux - Mac hardware is like two years ahead of PC currently in pretty much any regard aside from gaming. I keep looking for an iteration where it makes sense to switch but currently the intel core 3 stuff is at best comparable to M5 base. Strix Halo is much more power hungry and also not that impressive other than having a bunch of cores. Nothing comes close to the pro/max chips in M4 series. And with RAM/storage pricing Apple upgrades are looking reasonably priced (TBD when M5 Pro devices launch).

So I can either get a top tier tool when I upgrade this year or I can buy a subpar device, and the power management is going to likely be even worse on Linux.

  • barrkel 5 days ago

    I think this mostly only holds if you use local compute in a portable form factor.

    Most of my personal development these days is done on my home server - 9995wx, 768GB, rtx 6000 pro blackwell GPU in headless mode. My work development happens in a cloud workstation with 64 cores and 128GB of ram but builds are distributed and I can dial up the box size on demand for heavier development.

    I use laptops practically entirely as network client devices. Browser, terminal window, perhaps a VS Code based IDE with a remote connection to my code. Tailscale on my personal laptop to work anywhere.

    I'm not limited by local compute, my devices are lightweight, cheap(ish) and replaceable, not an investment.

    • rafaelmn 4 days ago

      I'd like to use this kind of setup but unfortunately every time I try there's just soo many annoying edge cases that are wasting my time. Especially when I need to do FE/Mobile - but even BE has gotchas. I guess it depends on your environment - I'll try making this setup work sometimes in the next few months again.

  • wraptile 4 days ago

    > Mac hardware is like two years ahead of PC currently in pretty much any regard aside from gaming

    and any contemporary ergonomics. Seriously, macbooks are an environmental hazard at this point: ultra glossy screen, hand twisting keyboard, wrist cutting sharp edges, lack of modern surge protections etc. etc. I genuinely don't understand this sentiment that macbook hardware is good.

  • reconnecting 5 days ago

    So whatever resources you have, Apple will use them mostly to render 3D glass effects. With Debian (Xfce), I can't speak for other desktop environments, you need roughly three times fewer resources to run the OS itself.

    • deaux 5 days ago

      Or you just don't run Tahoe?

      • reconnecting 5 days ago

        Actually, you don't have this choice anymore.

        Apple is disabling downgrading across all of iOS, and starting to do the same with MacOS. So you need to keep old hardware to run older MacOS versions, and it's only a matter of a few years before Tahoe is the latest OS you can run on your Mac.

      • array_key_first 4 days ago

        That's a very temporary solution to be fair. KDE and even, shudder, Gnome put mac os and windows to shame when it comes to responsiveness, performance, and resource usage.

        I mean, KDE does 3x the stuff for 1/3 the cost. That's more memory and CPU for your IDE or, more likely, chrome tabs.

jasoneckert 5 days ago

If Linux had a revenue stream and model, this would make sense. But the style of open-source is to make good software, and let others gravitate to you as a result.

[removed] 5 days ago
[deleted]
[removed] 5 days ago
[deleted]
jhickok 5 days ago

I am good laptop hardware away from making the move.

  • SomeHacker44 5 days ago

    HP Zbook Ultra G1a, 128GB RAM. Add SSD to taste. HP supported (Canonical OEM) Ubuntu with KDE. Works great as a daily driver with a UGreen GAN charger.

    • jhickok 4 days ago

      Interesting, I had never even heard of this laptop! Thanks for the tip!

  • neop1x 4 days ago

    I can also recommend HP Zbook Ultra G1a. It's probably the closest thing to Macbooks at the moment. It has lower battery life and latest M chips are still faster but it's fast enough for me. The hardware is solid and sw support is great.

  • aljgz 5 days ago

    I'm on frame.work with AMD, 96GB RAM. Using it with fedora+KDE Absolutely love it

  • [removed] 5 days ago
    [deleted]
kaydub 4 days ago

If there was an easy and supported way to put linux on a macbook I'd be back on linux but I can't give up the hardware.