Comment by vladms

Comment by vladms 4 days ago

I think the ideas was to try to explain why is a problem to choose something, it is not a comparison of the intensity / importance.

I am not sure you can make an argument of "other people are doing it too". Lots of people do things that it is not in their interest (ex: smoking, to pick the easy one).

As others mentioned, I did not have the negative connotation related to the word prism either, but not sure how could one check that anyhow. It is not like I was not surprised these years about what some other people think, so who knows... Maybe someone with experience in marketing could explain how it is done.

adammarples 4 days ago

But without the extremity of the Auschwitz example, it suddenly is not a problem. Prism is an unbelievably generic word and I had not even heard of the Snowdon one until now nor would I remember it if I had. Prism is one step away from "Triangle" in terms of how generic it is.

Reply View 3 replies

jackphilson 4 days ago

Triangle kind of reminds me of the Bermuda Triangle. You know how many people died there?

Reply View | 1 reply
- ConceptJunkie 4 days ago
  
  People? Do you know how many of them are murderers, fraudsters and all around finks. That's a terrible thing to mention.
  
  Reply View | 0 replies
order-matters 4 days ago

1 more perspective to add: while i did not know the NSA program was called prism, it did give me pause to find out in this thread. OpenAI surely knows what it was called, at least they should. So it begs the question of why.
If they claim in a private meeting with people at the NSA that they did it as a tribute to them and a bid for partnership, who would anyone here be to say they didnt? even if they didnt... which is only relevant because OpenAI processes an absolute shitton of data the NSA would be interested in

Reply View | 0 replies