donkeybeer 3 days ago

A banks not public property and the people being shot weren't engaging in any crime. A bank can decide what they allow in or not. Its extremely astounding you seem unaware of this. Your "analogy" is completely confused and meaningless.

  • kreetx 3 days ago

    The parent is just exemplifying how in specific situations having a gun with you drastically changes how you are perceived.

    • donkeybeer 3 days ago

      No, it's a completely absurd analogy that doesn't even begin to make sense.

      • kreetx 2 days ago

        It does: in context of an active war having a gun won't surprise anyone. In context of arresting someone and seeing a gun on that person makes that person appear lethally dangerous.

        • donkeybeer 2 days ago

          Why? If you are arrested for a parking ticket do you expect to be shot if you also happened to be carrying? It's understandable if one feels scared of someone wielding a firearm while confronting them. Therefore we should shoot any cops who attempt to come near us since they are armed and getting into an interaction with us and they appear lethally dangerous.

kreetx 5 days ago

It's funny how people use the lawfulness argument for carrying a gun to protest, but don't use the same argument against deporting illegals.

  • donkeybeer 3 days ago

    Nobody is stopping illegals from being deported. They just hace to prove illegality first. If you believe otherwise, I am more than happy to recommend you for imprisonment and deportation first before asking questions.

    • kreetx 3 days ago

      It's already proven as they are following through a court order.

      As far as I know, they are also first and foremost deporting illegals who are criminals to begin with.

      • donkeybeer 3 days ago

        Are you sure? Give me the numbers of how many are actual real court orders and how many are internal "warrants".