Comment by watwut

First you are lying. Second, noise is not an obstruction. It is ok and legal to produce whistles.

What is not legal is point guns at journalists, beat people who record you on the phones and shoot people in the back because they had phone in hand and you are frustrated. What is not legal is to throw pepper spray at people who are no threat. One gotta love the "they mass produce whistles" as a grave accusation while ICE men literally openly threaten to kill people who are no threat. Or kill them and then are proud of their murdering colleagues.

> I'm not mistaken in my understanding that Tim Walz is a Democrat, am I? The one making public speeches falsely claiming that ICE aren't LEO and encouraging "peaceful protest"

Yes, he had good speeches.

> without mentioning anything about obstruction of justice or resisting arrest?

Lol, heavily armed cowards jump at observer, 8 on one, there is no resistance and then they call it resisting arrest.

> For that matter, exactly what do you mean by "abolishing ICE"? Should it not be replaced? Should immigration law not be enforced? Should the USA allow everyone to reside within its borders who wishes to do so, with no barriers to entry?

ICE is basically a violent gang with impossible to reform culture. You dont hire gangmembers to do law enforcement. It needs to be abolished and people in it need to be banned from working in law enforcement.

>> Filming officiers performing their jobs is not obstruction

> This is irrelevant, because many people have been observed physically obstructing officers, whether or not they were filming at the time.

The OP made a point and you constructed the strawman of a hasty generalization. This is disingenuous.

>> while ICE men literally openly threaten to kill people who are no threat.

> Please show me where you think this has happened.

Re: "You raise your voice, I erase your voice," - January 27, 2026 Free speech is a right and I support their right to say whatever they want. They are subject to their own policies beyond that.

> he was not an "observer" (as demonstrated by the fact that he was in the middle of the street and a car had to swerve to avoid him),

You are cherry picking. He was an observer, among other things.

>> and then are proud of their murdering colleagues

> Please show me where you think this has happened.

10s in - https://youtube.com/shorts/IUBkPWVg3yY?si=eYXwZ5qmL6JmXYjr

I'm not trying to get you to agree with anything, but it's not constructive to continue. Many of your questions are asking other people for information that is readily available. Not everyone needs to agree on everything, but I don't think it's hard to understand the various sentiments.

zahlman 4 days ago

[flagged]

Reply View 1 reply

Supermancho 3 days ago

>> Filming officiers performing their jobs is not obstruction
> This is irrelevant, because many people have been observed physically obstructing officers, whether or not they were filming at the time.
The OP made a point and you constructed the strawman of a hasty generalization. This is disingenuous.
>> while ICE men literally openly threaten to kill people who are no threat.
> Please show me where you think this has happened.
Re: "You raise your voice, I erase your voice," - January 27, 2026 Free speech is a right and I support their right to say whatever they want. They are subject to their own policies beyond that.
> he was not an "observer" (as demonstrated by the fact that he was in the middle of the street and a car had to swerve to avoid him),
You are cherry picking. He was an observer, among other things.
>> and then are proud of their murdering colleagues
> Please show me where you think this has happened.
10s in - https://youtube.com/shorts/IUBkPWVg3yY?si=eYXwZ5qmL6JmXYjr
I'm not trying to get you to agree with anything, but it's not constructive to continue. Many of your questions are asking other people for information that is readily available. Not everyone needs to agree on everything, but I don't think it's hard to understand the various sentiments.

Reply View | 0 replies