tomhow 5 days ago

Please don't comment like this here. HN is for curious conversation, not this kind belligerence. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Reply View 2 replies
  • SV_BubbleTime 5 days ago

    Is the issue that I said he knew it was bullshit? Or is there a substantial issue with what the Twitter files were?

    Reply View 1 reply
    • tomhow 5 days ago

      The guidelines apply regardless of the topic or side, and our role is to uphold the guidelines, nothing more. We don't care (and often don't even know) what side or position you're arguing for. It's irrelevant, and we just don't even have time to get into it.

      The paragraph ”You can repeat that all you like. Wikipedia is bullshit on that and you know it.” is plainly not consistent with curious conversation.

      Reply View 0 replies
buellerbueller 5 days ago

Curious that Musk's/Twitter's lawyers also said the vast majority of the claims in the Twitter Files were unfounded.

What is your explanation for that?

Reply View 1 reply
  • SV_BubbleTime 4 days ago

    Why would I need to explain something I never brought up? I have no idea what musk said or what his claims are. How about you provide any citation? You brought up Musk as a strawman.

    You’ve multiple times claimed the Twitter files are a “nothing burger”…

    The truth is that there is concrete evidence of the Biden administration, pressuring media companies to sensor specific posts about Covid that they considered harmful to the narrative. Direct first amendment violations.

    You seem to not give any indication that you can have read Weiss or Taibbi’s articles.

    Jack Dorsey admitted it was true. So did Zuckerberg. Wild position you seem to have forced yourself into.

    Reply View 0 replies