Comment by TheAlchemist

Comment by TheAlchemist 5 days ago

5 replies

One may genuinly debate the genocide, racism, imperialism etc. But I can guarantee you that the 'opressed working class' in the US had it 100 times better than the non opressed Eastern European one.

dns_snek 5 days ago

It's so lazy to resort to the false dichotomy of US vs USSR, it doesn't say anything except "It's not as bad as it could've been". Every country in the world can point a finger at someone who had it worse.

And besides, "One may genuinly debate the genocide, racism, imperialism etc" is an essential part of why the working class had a good quality of life in the decades following WW2, particularly white people.

It's easy to build up a good lifestyle when you exploit foreign countries for resources and outsource your labor to poor people across the world because you're not the one paying the bill. But how do you sustain that when those people start demanding the same quality of life that you have? You don't, as we're seeing now.

  • parasubvert 4 days ago

    > It's easy to build up a good lifestyle when you exploit foreign countries for resources and outsource your labor to poor people across the world because you're not the one paying the bill. But how do you sustain that when those people start demanding the same quality of life that you have? You don't, as we're seeing now.

    That's quite an oversimplification of the prosperity of the US middle class, particularly given most of the gains happened prior to globalization.

I-M-S 5 days ago

Unfortunately it is true that the working class does seem to always get the short end of the bargain.

direwolf20 4 days ago

Is it? In the USSR, the poor had no indoor plumbing, and bread lines. But in the USA, the poor have no homes, and no bread.