Comment by JumpCrisscross

Comment by JumpCrisscross 5 days ago

14 replies

View on Hacker News

> won't be able to google image anything interesting related to "non-human hominids"

We were a large family [1].

> Real "are we the baddies?" moment

We were animals. We acted in accordance with our natures. Wolves and chimpanzees aren’t baddies any more than bees or hyenas. Nature is brutal.

Today, however, we are more than our natures. We have the capacity to criticize it when it arises in ways we disapprove of. In a certain sense, humans have a unique capacity to reduce suffering in a way without precedent in Earth’s natural history.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo

unfitted2545 5 days ago

That's kinda ridiculous to think we're not animals anymore, our nature is to use intellect for survival (and though we know we can reduce suffering further we choose not to).

Reply View 6 replies
  • ncr100 5 days ago

    It is a mind bender, yes.

    Your argument, written here and As far as I understand it at the moment, goes along with the other argument that everything is a simulation, or that everything that we do is preordained based upon physics. All mindbenders.

    I want to believe that I have the ability to make an educated decision when faced e.g. with impulses to suppress or oppress others, I do know that I can consider ramifications and benefits outside of those which directly impact me.

    So, perhaps it's better to say, we can be unanimal like rather than simply not animal, at all? What do you think?

    Reply View 5 replies
    • butlike 4 days ago

      We don't have the capacity to act "unanimal" at all. Deprive anyone of food or sincerely try and harm their children. You'll get the fall of Rome and French Revolution every time.

      You eat, sleep, procreate, go to the grocery store (hunt). You honk at others they are preventing you from getting where you're going. You size up other males if you're male, females if you're female. Your favorite food is your favorite food and not mine because YOUR biology dictates that to you based on your experience. You consider ramifications as a self-preserving defense mechanism, not as some social cordiality.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • unfitted2545 5 days ago

      I do believe in determinism.

      I see what you mean by being able to consider the worth of harming something for your own gain. But doesn't this apply to all animals? If a bear was hungry I'm sure they would happily eat you, but they would probably think twice if they weren't. Same for early humans, it's just we have our technologies (which our intellectual nature has enabled) now to prop us up and not have to really think about survival.

      The main thing I'm curious to hear your thoughts on is what are we if not animals? Gods? That's surely completely relative, like an anteater to an ant.

      Reply View 1 reply
      • withinboredom 4 days ago

        If you hop off the modern treadmill ... you'll very quickly be thinking about survival. I once ate a salad off the ground, I was so hungry. It only takes a few days and we regress to degenerate animals.

        I'm pretty sure governments know this and want to prevent it at all costs beyond a certain point.

        Reply View 0 replies
    • WalterBright 5 days ago

      > everything is a simulation

      The "simulation" is indistinguishable from god.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • pinnochio 5 days ago

      > Your argument, written here and As far as I understand it at the moment, goes along with the other argument that everything is a simulation,

      What?

      This isn't a mindbender. You're just drawing lines.

      Edit: I slightly misread your comment as advocating that we're not animals. However, whether one describes us as not animals or able to be "unanimal like" is still a matter of drawing lines.

      Reply View 0 replies
staplers 5 days ago

  humans have a unique capacity to reduce suffering in a way
With low cost to our wellbeing as well. Which I think is the main point. Our advances in logistical transportation and food production allow us to be kinder and more plentiful than ever before. Unfortunately we see "instinctual" echoes of past strife seemingly arise from minor inconveniences (those ppl do something that annoys me).
Reply View 1 reply
  • butlike 4 days ago

    Explain to me, specifically, how we have the capacity to reduce suffering.

    > Our advances in logistical transportation and food production allow us to be kinder and more plentiful than ever before.

    Are the fisheries not overfished? Are the chickens not caged inhumanely? Is last-mile logistics not a problem? Are microplastics in the water not giving 20-year olds cancer?

    Reply View 0 replies
reactordev 5 days ago

As equal to their ability to cause it. It’s this dichotomy that makes us, human. We have the power of destruction, the power of criticism, the power of nurturing, and the power to advance. We are amazing animals.

Reply View 2 replies
  • throwaway173738 5 days ago

    You might say we have eaten the fruit of the tree of knowledge but not the tree of wisdom. So although we can act against our base nature we don’t always.

    Reply View 1 reply
pinnochio 5 days ago

> Today, however, we are more than our natures.

This really depends on how you define nature. Attempts to delineate what is and is not nature tend to be motivated.

Reply View 0 replies