Comment by rationalist Comment by rationalist 5 days ago 3 replies Copy Link View on Hacker News Why does a person have to be "for" something?
Copy Link Psillisp 5 days ago Collapse Comment - [flagged] Reply View | 2 replies Copy Link Volundr 5 days ago Parent Next Collapse Comment - The statement was made to point out that this is an example where a phone number is enough metadata to to problematic for privacy. It stands on its own. It doesn't need more context or purpose. Reply View | 0 replies Copy Link rationalist 5 days ago Parent Prev Collapse Comment - "sleaze"? Reply View | 0 replies
Copy Link Volundr 5 days ago Parent Next Collapse Comment - The statement was made to point out that this is an example where a phone number is enough metadata to to problematic for privacy. It stands on its own. It doesn't need more context or purpose. Reply View | 0 replies
[flagged]