Comment by ViewTrick1002
Comment by ViewTrick1002 2 hours ago
> In my mind, the only viable way out is the power density of nuclear.
How adding would more expensive energy solve it? I don’t get what ”energy density” has to do with it at all?
All western schemes to build new nuclear power are enormously subsidized.
Laughably, neither can wind in fact, and there’s still plenty of open question on if wind is even net positive at all.
The only reason tech like that spears to work is because of partial investment. Unfortunately wind comes at tremendous cost and destruction of natural landscapes, enormous maintenance, and piles of carbon fiber waste.