Comment by breppp

Comment by breppp 6 hours ago

3 replies

a better argument might be that chrome protects their own vs a research group in google switzerland, however as other mentioned the security implications of another unsafe binary parser in a browser is hardly worth it

archerx 5 hours ago
  • breppp 4 hours ago

    which only strengthens my argument, webp seemed like some ad-hoc pet project in chrome, and that ended like most unsafe binary parsers, with critical vulnerabilities

    • magicalist an hour ago

      > webp seemed like some ad-hoc pet project in chrome

      FWIW webp came from the same "research group in google switzerland" that later developed jpegxl.