Comment by charcircuit
Comment by charcircuit 4 hours ago
The US has gotten tremendous value from AI agents, so I think the trade off was worth it for 2025.
Comment by charcircuit 4 hours ago
The US has gotten tremendous value from AI agents, so I think the trade off was worth it for 2025.
Fair point - yet the very official US stance is to reduce regulation and what not. If it was the sarcasm, it'd be the "US population". I could contribute 'tremendous' for obvious reasons but still.
That would likely the 1st time to miss sarcasm... need few more words not the '/s' (I never use /s)
And we represent 0.1% of the population at best. Not really sustainable.
We are destroying the planet and we will come to regret this on our death beds. If anyone doubts that, go for a walk in nature and appreciate how incredible our ecosystems are, and how lucky we are to have that biodiversity, not AI agents.
Edit: I see you edited your comment from 'I have gotten gotten tremendous value from AI agents' to 'The US has gotten tremendous value from AI agents'. But the general point still applies.