Comment by irjustin

Comment by irjustin 15 hours ago

7 replies

View on Hacker News

Late to the party, I really wish everyone would copy Rails + Ruby, but specifically it's Rails additions.

2 things it got right:

1. Like the article a great API - Time.current.in_time_zone('America/Los_Angeles') + 3.days - 4.months + 1.hour

2. Rails overloads Ruby's core library Time. You're in 1 object the whole time no swap/wondering.

In the py world, pendulum is close but just like the article, it's cumbersome as it's still a separate obj (i.e. Temporal vs Date) and so you need to "figure out" what you have to manipulate or need to cast it first.

Overloading the core libs is dangerous for a whole host of reasons but for the end developer it's a pleasure to use.

If we could just do `new Date().add({ days: 1})` it would be so easier.

happytoexplain 13 hours ago

>3.days - 4.months + 1.hour

Is this what it looks like? A specific concept like time units being defined as members of more general types like numbers? I.e. if I type `1.` to get auto-complete, am I going to see days, and all the rest, as options?? That API design pattern would be a nightmare!

Reply View 4 replies
  • greiskul 12 hours ago

    In Ruby, I assume this is done by monkey patching, so yes, it would have all the issues you mention and fear.

    In more modern languages like Kotlin, there is a notion of extension methods and properties, where you would be able to write a library that allows this syntax, but the .days property would only be accessible in files where you have explicitly imported it (so basically a synthetic sugar for a static function call).

    Reply View 0 replies
  • werdnapk 3 hours ago

    I haven't used autocomplete in over 20 years. Why does this even need an autocomplete? The "API" is dead simple.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • happytoexplain 2 hours ago

      Why write in this dismissive tone? Regardless of your personal situation, it would be hard to believe you don't share the common knowledge that virtually everybody uses auto-complete to some degree, e.g. to remember, discover, or abbreviate type/instance methods, argument lists, etc. And why is "API" in quotes? It's very normal to refer to interfaces in languages/platforms as APIs (e.g. "JavaScript's Date API").

      Regardless, whether or not a person uses autocomplete for this API is irrelevant - in this case it would be anybody using numbers for things outside this API, and maximally it would be the whole platform if this design pattern is not unique to this API. I.e. the simplicity of this one API has no bearing on the question.

      Reply View 0 replies
  • pprotas 10 hours ago

    Here is the neat part about Ruby, your autocomplete barely works and your IDE can only guess what you want, instead of relying on a good language service…

    Reply View 0 replies
publicdebates 15 hours ago

> 3.days - 4.months + 1.hour

How is that a good thing?

> Rails overloads Ruby's core library Time. You're in 1 object the whole time regardless of what you do.

How is that a good thing?

Reply View 1 reply