Comment by brokencode

Comment by brokencode 16 hours ago

2 replies

I’m not so sure. Just think about coding assistants with MCP based tools. I can use multiple different models in GitHub Copilot and get good results with similarly capable models.

Siri’s functionality and OS integration could be exposed in a similar, industry-standard way via tools provided to the model.

Then any other model can be swapped in quite easily. Of course, they may still want to do fine tuning, quantization, performance optimization for Apple’s hardware, etc.

But I don’t see why the actual software integration part needs to be difficult.

andsoitis 11 hours ago

> But I don’t see why the actual software integration part needs to be difficult.

That’s not the issue. The issue is that once Gemini is in place as the intelligence behind Siri, the bar is now much higher than today and so you have to be more careful if you consider replacing Gemini, because you’re as likely as not to make Siri worse. Maybe more likely to make it worse.

  • brokencode 3 hours ago

    Oh well that’s a good problem to have, isn’t it? Siri being so good that they don’t want to mess it up.

    That gives them plenty of runway to test and optimize new models internally before release and not feel like they need to rush them out because Siri sucks.