Comment by y42

Comment by y42 19 hours ago

14 replies

Indeed there are and this is no rocket science. Like Word Documents offer a change history, deleted files go to the trash first, there are undo functions, TimeMachine on MacOs, similar features on Windows, even sandbox features.

fuzzy2 19 hours ago

Trash is a shell feature. Unless a program explicitly "moves to trash", deleting is final. Same for Word documents.

So, no, there is no undo in general. There could be under certain circumstances for certain things.

  • NewsaHackO 18 hours ago

    I mean, I'm pretty sure it would be trivial to tell it to move files to the trash instead of deleting them. Honestly, I thought that on Windows and Mac, the default is to move files to the trash unless you explicitly say to permanently delete them.

    • fuzzy2 4 hours ago

      Yes, it is (relatively, [1]) trivial. However, even though it is the shell default (Finder, Windows Explorer, whatever Linux file manager), it is not the operating system default. If you call unlink or DeleteFile or use a utility that does (like rm), the file isn’t going to trash.

      [1]: https://github.com/arsenetar/send2trash (random find, not mine)

    • johnisgood 17 hours ago

      Because it is the default. Heck, it is the default for most DEs and many programs on Linux, too.

  • Ajedi32 19 hours ago

    Everything on a ZFS/BTRFS partition with snapshots every minute/hour/day? I suppose depending on what level of access the AI has it could wipe that too but seems like there's probably a way to make this work.

    • literalAardvark 19 hours ago

      I guess it depends on what its goals at the time are. And access controls.

      May just trash some extra files due to a fuzzy prompt, may go full psychotic and decide to self destruct while looping "I've been a bad Claude" and intentionally delete everything or the partitions to "limit the damage".

      Wacky fun

    • antinomicus 19 hours ago

      The topic of the discussion is something that parents, grandmas, and non technical colleagues would realistically be able to use.

      • Ajedi32 19 hours ago

        A "revert filesystem state to x time" button doesn't seem that hard to use. I'm imagining this as a potential near-term future product implementation, not a home-brewed DIY solution.

        • darkwater 7 hours ago

          A filesystemt state in time is VERY complicated to use, if you are reverting the whole filesystem. A granular per-file revert should not be that complicated, but it needs to be surfaced easily in the UI and people need to know aout it (in the case of Cowork I would expect the agent to use it as part of its job, so transparent to the user)

  • OJFord 18 hours ago

    Shell? You meant Finder I think?

    • Alphaeus 14 hours ago

      GUI shell (as opposed to a text-based shell).

[removed] 18 hours ago
[deleted]
cush 19 hours ago

State isn't always local too

[removed] 19 hours ago
[deleted]