Comment by peteey

Comment by peteey a day ago

15 replies

Generally agreed. Though, Daniel Tiger and Paw Patrol should be judged differently. Paw Patrol is mindless and addictive.

If you desperately need a distraction, PBS shows are less bad. A few moments of pacification may be worth not disturbing the other airline travelers.

Daniel Tiger may be helpful to parents too. Interacting with children is not intuitive. Techniques from PBS shows have helped me. For example, singing to kids about trying food is move effective than a well reasoned monologue.

01100011 16 hours ago

Some commenters either:

1. Do not have children.

2. Have a strong support network.

3. Have their partner or professional handle most aspects of child raising and have a warped understanding of dealing with a precocious and active toddler.

It's great that some folks have kids that like books and keep themselves busy. It's not so great that their parents think that is the reality most parents enjoy.

  • sgt 6 hours ago

    Sometimes you literally have to give them something in order for you to get something done. We keep screen time to max 30 minutes a day though for our 5 year old.

    • ckozlowski an hour ago

      5yo parent here. Agreed. And sometimes they just need to chill.

      I agree with the overall sentiment. Too much screen time is bad. Kids need to get out and play, indoors or out. In our house, it's a lot of biking and playing with friends outside, Legos, Brio, Magnatiles, matchbox cars, or just crafts.

      But sometimes they're frazzled, out of sorts, and would benefit from just being able to sit and chill.

      So we'll put on something for him that we're comfortable with. Tumble Leaf, Blaze & The Monster Machines, Trash Truck, or the occasional Ghibli movie.

      We do not give him a tablet or other portable device. He sits and watches on the couch, we set a expectation, and stick to that.

      I think controlling the device is important. Keeping the screen as something we control and not something he carries around seems to allow us better control and helps him understand the limits in play. 90% of the time, we have no fuss.

      And it's not bad. In moderation, TV can be just fine. Often it genuinely helps him soothe and relax (Especially if he's been really active and engaged all day), and as you said, helps us get something done. Two episodes of one of his favorite shows is great to help him unwind while we're making dinner.

      But we keep time/episode limits as well, and that seems to keep things in balance along with the aforementioned things.

  • nashashmi 5 hours ago

    A tv is like a pacifier. It ruins the parent’s ability to connect with their kids.

thesuitonym 20 hours ago

Daniel Tiger was a godsend when my kids were younger. They loved it, and the little jingles helped us get through some of those tricky parenting situations. They're easy to remember, and the kids immediately understood.

AuryGlenz a day ago

I'm not going to praise Paw Patrol as something on the level of Daniel Tiger or Bluey, but it's not completely mindless. It shows problem solving, teamwork, and encourages being helpful.

  • cheald a day ago

    It's not entirely devoid of value, but that doesn't make it a good idea. Junk food contains healthy ingredients, too.

    • gffrd a day ago

      My gripe with Paw Patrol is that everything is met with a cheery "sir, yes sir!" and then the show stops short of ever showing real challenge, friction, risk, failure, or loss.

      It's a missed opportunity.

      • 01100011 16 hours ago

        Don't overthink it. Some of us were raised on Looney Tunes and MTV and somehow still figure out normal social interactions and do quite well in life.

        40 years ago my parents had a close friend with a young and irresponsible wife who raised their child in front of a TV. At 4 years old the child could barely speak. My parents began babysitting and helping socialize her. Now she's a successful businessperson herself and is doing quite well in life.

        Studies on the impact of media on children are informative but don't lose sight of the fact that kids are adaptable and will overcome most kinds of sub-optimal upbringing.

  • tempestn 12 hours ago

    Agreed. There's a tier list that probably goes something like Bluey, Daniel Tiger, MLP, Paw Patrol, Pepa Pig,,,, Caillou.

    • aidenn0 11 hours ago

      I'm far from being a Caillou apologist, but putting it below, much less way below, Pepa Pig is rather harsh.

      • tempestn 8 hours ago

        Fair enough, my kids are older now, so my memory isn't too fresh. And I despised both of those enough that I didn't get much of a sample size! Man could I not stand Caillou though.

taegee 4 hours ago

The sentence that TV is generally bad for kids at that age is generally true independent of the content. It's the medium itself.