Comment by jacquesm
That's what's so sad about youtube. 20 minute videos to encode a hundred words of usable content to get you to click on a link. The inefficiency is just staggering.
That's what's so sad about youtube. 20 minute videos to encode a hundred words of usable content to get you to click on a link. The inefficiency is just staggering.
Youtube can be excellent for explanations. A picture's worth a thousand words, and you can fit a lot of decent pictures in a 20 minute video. The signal-to-noise can be high, of course.