ImPrajyoth 19 hours ago

OP here. this is a cursed project lol, but i wanted to see: What happens if you replace the OS scheduler with an LLM?

With Groq speed (Llama 3 @ 800t/s), inference is finally fast enough to be in the system loop.

i built this TUI to monitor my process tree. instead of just showing CPU %, it checks the context (parent process, disk I/O) to decide if a process is compiling code or bloatware. It roasts, throttles, or kills based on that.

Its my experiment in "Intelligent Kernels" how they would be. i used Delta Caching to keep overhead low.

2001zhaozhao 15 hours ago

It really is cursed to be spending hundreds of watts of power in a datacenter somewhere to make a laptop run slightly faster.

  • ImPrajyoth 5 hours ago

    oh absolutely. burning a coal plant to decide if i should close discord is peak 2025 energy. strictly speaking, using the local model (Ollama) is 'free' in terms of watts since my laptop is on anyway, but yeah, if the inefficiency is the art, I'm the artist.

p_ing 19 hours ago

You can't replace the NTOS scheduler. This is more of an automated (?) process manager.

  • ImPrajyoth 19 hours ago

    you are technically right (the best kind of right). i am running in userspace, so i cant replace the actual thread scheduling logic in Ring 0 without writing a driver and BSODing my machine.

    think of this more as a High-Level Governor. The NTOS scheduler decides which thread runs next, but this LLM decides if that process deserves to exist at all.

    basically; NTOS tries to be fair to every process. BrainKernel overrides that fairness with judgment. if i suspend a process, i have effectively vetoed the scheduler.

    • p_ing 16 hours ago

      > NTOS tries to be fair to every process

      This is a super simplification of the NTOS scheduler. It's not that dumb!

      > if i suspend a process, i have effectively vetoed the scheduler.

      I mean, I suppose? It's the NTOS scheduler doing the suspension. It's like changing the priority level -- sure, you can do it, but it's generally to your detriment outside of corner cases.

devmor 17 hours ago

This is a pretty funny project, you've outsourced the neurotic developers that keep their task manager open and kill off processes they don't like.

I wouldn't call it replacing the scheduler though - more that you've made a scheduler manager.

  • ImPrajyoth 5 hours ago

    haha exactly. i realized i spent too much time staring at htop wondering what is this process?, so i decided to automate my own anxiety.

    Scheduler Manager is definitely the more accurate term. Im just the middleman between the chaos and the kernel.

  • DougN7 7 hours ago

    I resemble that comment!

    But seriously, it does really bug me on principle that DropBox should use over half a GB simply because it uses Chromium, even when nothing is visible.