UnmappedStack 2 days ago

Yup, it is pretty much just a better frontend for existing search. I want to build my own index and ranking algorithm in the future, but sadly it's quite resource intensive so it will depend on financial viability a bit in terms of timeframe.

  • RadiozRadioz 2 days ago

    So it's not a search engine, it's a frontend for a search engine.

    • dangus 2 days ago

      You can just turn off the AI feature in Brave search so it’s sort of extra pointless.

      It’s possibly worth pointing out that the about page doesn’t offer any indicator that this is an actual nonprofit entity from a legal standpoint, so at this point I have to assume it’s just a sole proprietorship that is pinky promising to become a non-profit.

      In that sense I’m quite happy “donating” to Kagi to provide a stable and supported product from a company with employees.

      • UnmappedStack 2 days ago

        That's fair enough. For the record I do intend to apply for a non-profit official entity. I would say it still has a role as opposed to Brave considering the lack of advertising though.

        • dangus 2 days ago

          I certainly assume your heart is in the right place. I felt like it was worth warning people to do research before making donations.

  • Fnoord 2 days ago

    There's tons of these frontends, including SearXNG and proprietary (but very good) Kagi. Kagi are working on their own index; this will be their meat.

    I am convinced LLMs are the way forward for searching, with a caveat: what they summarize isn't very relevant (it is overrated). It just gives a (hopefully accurate) semantic context. What matters is the sources it directs to. These are your links normally on top of ypur search query.

    • windexh8er 2 days ago

      I'm genuinely curious why "LLMs are the way forward for searching".

      Is it that the results won't be stack ranked lists anymore and instead a conversational output? Personally that's not what I want. I want results that are contextual to my search. If there's a use case for LLMs in search this would be, at least for me, what I'd be looking for. It seems, however, that all of the AI in search results today are not that.

      I do pay for Kagi and will continue if the quality of the product continues to offer the quality product that it is today.

  • riedel 2 days ago

    openwebsearch.eu wants to build an open index. But despite the funding it is still quite sparse.

  • [removed] 2 days ago
    [deleted]