Comment by gs17

Comment by gs17 8 hours ago

1 reply

I'm not understanding your categories. Every dictionary word is flagged? It seems any first or last name is a "public_figure" ("apple" is a "public_figure" and also a "brand", I guess that means there's someone named Apple? Tim Apple?)?

It "blocks profanity", but "shithead", "assfucker", etc. are allowed (not to mention obfuscating a restricted term even slightly, e.g. "sh1t")? Yes, the Scunthorpe problem exists, but you can do better, and should if you're expecting people to pay to wait 500ms.

Something that detects these sorts of things very well could actually be worth paying for, although it still would probably be better off as a library.

choraria 7 hours ago

Thanks and this gives me more perspective too. Here's what I'm hearing:

- need to improve categorisation (some are miscategorised, some categories don't make sense) - better list; more subsets to block (fair and very true) — this is an evolving list and so I'll work on constantly adding more to it (currently has ~1.7million records; will go to 2.5 in the next few days) - latency is a killer

Again, I said it in another comment too, I'm pretty happy with this (tears on the inside) because the problem at least is validated in some way.

I just need to do better in terms of solutioning; which, IMO, is doable.