choraria 7 hours ago

I thought about this and decided against complicating ways in which this can be restricted. Honestly, this is a super simple challenge to solve. Perhaps I should introduce this as an API parameter to detect variations. That way, not just taylor_swift but t_aylorswift, ta_ylorswift etc. could also be detected and flagged.

As for realtaylorswift, I thought about that too. I don't think — and this is my personal opinion, obviously — most platforms wouldn't want to restrict this because then it really becomes unmanageable. I could obviously be wrong though and these could very easily be introduced to the API also (i.e. detect obvious username patterns) and totally open to adding that as an API parameter too.

Reply View 6 replies
  • chaps 7 hours ago

    Friend, with respect, these "simple challenge"s really start to add up very quickly, especially after edge cases.

    Highly recommend you read this and similar posts: https://www.kalzumeus.com/2010/06/17/falsehoods-programmers-...

    Reply View 5 replies
    • choraria 7 hours ago

      Damn! Just read the title and a few lines from the post but will definitely go through it fully and thoroughly. Thanks for sharing.

      I didn't mean to reduce the complexity of the challenge. Was mostly trying to convey that the specific cases being discussed, should be something that I could quickly solution and incorporate in the API.

      You're right about ALL the different kinds of edge cases that exist though and really, I'm trying to have this API be the go-to solution for it. Clearly, it's still not there. But it will be. I'm now more sure than ever.

      Reply View 0 replies
    • gs17 7 hours ago

      > I can safely assume that this dictionary of bad words contains no people’s names in it.

      This is a big one for this kind of project, and I've never been sure how usernames for people named Kike should be handled.

      Reply View 3 replies
      • choraria 6 hours ago

        Good point. Currently, I've got "kike" as a Spanish dictionary word and also a public figure. Honestly, the job of this API stops there. It tells the platform that this username needs to be handled differently than "randomusername7346783" which has absolutely no value. Now, what we do with this info is really up to admins/platform owners. They could simply do nothing, flag and monitor, charge a premium or block outright. Totally their call but they can now programmatically decide that.

        Reply View 2 replies
chaps 7 hours ago

Hah no kidding. I tried just, "bill_gates" --

  {
    "username": "bill_gates",
    "isReserved": false,
    "isDeleted": false,
    "categories": []
  }
what's the point of this thing...?
Reply View 4 replies
  • gs17 7 hours ago

    It's odd that they focused so much on "it's better than regexes" when it doesn't handle these cases where a regex would do well.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • choraria 7 hours ago

      The comment on regex was really because that's what I did when I built internal reserved usernames list of 2 of my URL shortener projects. I love regex, btw. BUT, I don't think they cover all of what we need with usernames specifically. Shared some more insights on the thread about variations too (like underscores etc.).

      Reply View 0 replies
  • bpt3 7 hours ago

    Why would I want billgates to be reserved in the first place, unless I'm Microsoft?

    And the definition of a "public figure" is absurdly broad and inconsistent. Some very common names are flagged as reserved for what are extremely minor celebrities at best (like an assistant coach of a college basketball team, or a actor with barely any formal credits as examples, and some other obscure athletes are marked as reserved while others are not).

    Reply View 1 reply
    • choraria 6 hours ago

      Well, to clarify, this API is really for folks who're building platforms that require usernames. For ex: imagine if you were building the next Twitter or anything that requires usernames. There, you'd want to know what's happening with these kinds of usernames, where, people are now prepared to pay for too (premium usernames). Similarly, for cases where the names are offensive or profane, you may want to block outright.

      As for definition of specific categories (more specifically public figures), you're right. Currently, it's just me building this and so I had to decide where to draw the line. I just drew it around the entire earth which I know is NOT the best appraoch but that's the one I went with just to ensure I cover all bases. Honestly, the API would tell if and why a username could be deemed reserved/premium. What to do with this info is really up to the platforms that are consuming it. They could let it slide, do nothing, just flag and monitor, block etc.

      Reply View 0 replies