Comment by jaggs Comment by jaggs 7 hours ago 1 reply Copy Link View on Hacker News Nice job conveniently ignoring the dirty processing problem.
Copy Link JumpCrisscross 3 hours ago Collapse Comment - > ignoring the dirty processing problemYou concluded it’s processed dirtily at the source based on that premise (“which means”). If you’re independently asserting that, you’d have a point. Reply View | 0 replies
> ignoring the dirty processing problem
You concluded it’s processed dirtily at the source based on that premise (“which means”). If you’re independently asserting that, you’d have a point.