Comment by stingraycharles

Comment by stingraycharles 3 hours ago

6 replies

I also like to think this was maybe done as a form of malicious compliance. Someone inside the agency was tasked with redacting this, and found a way to sneak the information through but still getting it passed by their supervisors, so that the information got out.

sallveburrpi 2 hours ago

To me this is the only explanation that makes sense. However wouldn’t they risk repercussions when this is inevitably found out? I assume they have records who redacted which documents

  • DerArzt 2 hours ago

    Some peopledo things acknowledging that there may be backlash for an action when they feel it's the right thing to do.

  • stingraycharles 2 hours ago

    Yes they may get fired, but it will be difficult to prove intent and very easy to claim incompetence.

    So I don’t think there will be jail time if that’s what you’re referring to.

    • seg_lol 2 hours ago

      The mal-redacted file actually points to a crime itself of redacting things it shouldn't have.

      • fwip an hour ago

        Or, if there is indeed an ongoing investigation on those two, it could be leaking that fact, right?