Comment by yetihehe

Comment by yetihehe 7 hours ago

27 replies

USA is still very high, so they can go much much lower, but I think they might go to some still lower places, finding them where we didn't even know such places could exist. Some ideas:

- Leave NATO

- Start openly supporting Russia and North Korea

- Arrest whole International Criminal Court

- Preventively invade China

baby 6 hours ago

I'm convinced slavery will be reintroduced before 2028

  • Ekaros 6 hours ago

    Fully enshrined in the constitution with massive support for the document. Just need to imprison them for something first.

  • UniverseHacker an hour ago

    I know you’re joking, but grievance over the loss of slavery after the civil war is privately one of the major drivers behind Trumps extremely loyal core supporters.

  • immibis 6 hours ago

    Slavery has never been illegal in the US. The 13th amendment leaves slavery legal as punishment for a crime. The US has the highest rate of crime punishment in the world (higher than places like North Korea), an industry that profits by selling slave labour of those punished criminals, and known ties between those who profit from selling slave labour and those who decide how many things should be crimes.

  • PeterStuer 6 hours ago

    It's not a slave if you just rent them from the cartels. /s

rurban 6 hours ago

Reintroduce witch burning.

Reintroduce death penalties on public squares.

Taking Greenland and Venezuela is given, as they took most of Latin America already. Just the new Mexican president looks like the next thorn in their eyes. Too competent, too social, too anti-corruption.

potato3732842 4 hours ago

Support for NATO within the US is Isreal-lite for different demographics. Pouring resources into it isn't without downsides.

RonanSoleste 5 hours ago

They effectively already left NATO and openly support Russia already. ICC members are already under fire and some had their microsoft account banned by Trump. Trump will invade Greenland and Canada first. China is less of an priority.

  • rcbdev 5 hours ago

    > They effectively already left NATO

    What the fuck are you talking about? Someone should tell Russia.

    • vanviegen 5 hours ago

      NATO works by projecting a united force. Nations unconditionally backing each other up. The USA is now clearly no longer a part of that. That's not to say that the USA will do nothing if a NATO member is attacked. It might. Or not.

      • jonnybgood 4 hours ago

        For much of NATO history, the US is NATO. The US doesn’t want it to be like that anymore because it needs to strategically shift to the other side of the world. So, the US says “What if Europe can be NATO? If we can force them to meet the GDP commitment then maybe we don’t need to worry about them too much and commit less of our own resources to this theater.” But of course people interpret this as if the US is abandoning the alliance. No, the US just has other problems to deal with in the world.

      • SirHumphrey 4 hours ago

        One can only imagine what America not fighting an attack on NATO member would have on nuclear proliferation.

    • wisty 5 hours ago

      There's a left wing cooker conspiracy theory that the guy who gave Ukraine the Javalin anti tank missiles and forced NATO to increase military spending to 5% of GDP is actually a secret Russian agent.

      • alimw an hour ago

        You literally just used NATO for a grouping that does not include the US.

        • wisty 6 minutes ago

          Can you rephrase what I said without "literally using NATO for a grouping that does not include the US"?

          I didn't even mention the US lol, I think you're paranoid but please, correct me ...