Comment by xhkkffbf
Comment by xhkkffbf a day ago
So is the data extracted the names of the victims that were supposed to be hidden to protect them? Or is there something else that might be worthy of exposing?
Comment by xhkkffbf a day ago
So is the data extracted the names of the victims that were supposed to be hidden to protect them? Or is there something else that might be worthy of exposing?
>It isn’t going to be a victims name copy pasted 80 times in a row…
You can't possibly know that!
(Sorry, watching Grinch, Jim Carrey spoke through me).
The downvoters assume that it is a bad faith question. The downvoters are 99% right with that. If the 1% hit then OP is just exceedingly naive and did not followed the scandal in which case they should maybe first do some reading.
The names of involved powerful people were NOT supposed to be censored. All those names except Bill Clinton name were redacted. To protect Trump and everybody else involved in the scandal except said Bill Clinton. But especially to protect Trump.
They also obscured the male perpetrators faces and bodies in many images, illegaly.
I assume that de facto federal "law" now makes it illegal to be raped, and those men are the victims. That would be a logical conclusion of edgelord vice signalling, right?
I know what all of these words mean, but not when they're in this order.
It seems the redactions are to protect the perpetrators.