Comment by plodman

Comment by plodman 2 days ago

17 replies

There appears to be a dark pattern occurring where the Tahoe update is selected by default and you need to uncheck it to just install the security update.

schmuckonwheels 2 days ago

Is there a new technological space race between Microsoft and Apple, to see who can engineer more dark patterns into their software, forcing unwanted updates onto its users?

These techniques used to be exclusive to spyware distributors.

  • DamnableNook a day ago

    Yes, it’s “spyware” to want you to update an OS. That’s definitely the definition of that. Good job for decoding conspiracy.

DavideNL 2 days ago
  • JumpCrisscross 2 days ago

    "Leon Cowle was brave enough to try this out, and, it turns out, just clicking the 'Update Now' button next to Sequoia will, thankfully, do the right thing: install the Sequoia 15.7.2 update, not Tahoe."

    This suggests someone forgot to update the "ⓘ" text. Not a dark pattern.

layer8 2 days ago

It’s the same on iPad. You get a notification about 18.7.3 being available, but when tapping on it, the update screen preselects 26.2.

LeoPanthera 2 days ago

Offering the most recent update first is not a "dark pattern".

jeffbee 2 days ago

That is not what "dark pattern" means.

  • fuzzy2 2 days ago

    No, I would certainly say it is. Checking the blog post linked in this thread, I find selecting a different version to be both hidden and also have (intentionally?) bad UX. That is exactly what a dark pattern is: making a surprising choice (major upgrade) the default while hiding away the less disruptive or even non-disruptive choice (minor upgrade).

    Nothing stops Apple from advertising both at the same level.

    • jeffbee 2 days ago

      That's ridiculous. Like, not even rising to the level of being worth arguing about. There's an entire book that defines dark pattern, you should probably go read it if you intend to use the phrase.

  • [removed] 2 days ago
    [deleted]
  • avazhi 2 days ago
    • hombre_fatal 2 days ago

      No, because following major software updates is the right thing for 99% of people, not staying behind on a previous major version with security updates.

      You have to think about UX for 99%, not just for HNers who might know what a 15.7.3 is.

      • avazhi a day ago

        > No, because following major software updates is the right thing for 99% of people

        Not if we aren’t talking about security updates. In this case the previous version of iOS also has the same security updates so ‘updating’ to a new version is completely up to the user, with no difference in security posture either way. Tricking users into updating for what are in the tech company’s opinion ‘new features’ is by definition a dark pattern.

        • hombre_fatal 21 hours ago

          I used to think this kind of stuff until I had to make similar decisions about UX for technical software that wasn't just used by engineers.

          "Want to upgrade to 15.7.3 or 26.2?" is just a nonstarter.

          Kinda feels like crying wolf and watering down the term to invoke "dark pattern" for platform software upgrades.

      • jtbayly a day ago

        If there are security updates, then actually staying on the old OS is probably better for 99% of users. Constant change is almost impossible for most people to deal with.

    • jeffbee 2 days ago

      Having a default choice is not itself a dark pattern. Offering a free update to the latest version of the project, and a choice to update a branch release instead, does not constitute a dark pattern.

      • avazhi a day ago

        The dark pattern emerges when you mislead the user about what they’re clicking. Deception in the UI is by definition a dark pattern.

        Weird hill for you to die on given that dark patterns have been specifically legislated for in many jurisdictions and have a clear definition.