Comment by thaumasiotes

Comment by thaumasiotes an hour ago

3 replies

> As far as anybody can tell, mathematics is way older than literature.

That depends what you mean by "literature". If you want it to be written down, then it's very recent because writing is very recent.

But it would be normal to consider cultural products to be literature regardless of whether they're written down. Writing is a medium of transmission. You wouldn't study the epic of Gilgamesh because it's written down. You study it to see what the Sumerians thought about the topics it covers, or to see which god some iconography that you found represents, or... anything that it might plausibly tell you. But the fact that it was written down is only the reason you can study it, not the reason you want to.

mkl an hour ago

> That depends what you mean by "literature". If you want it to be written down

That is what literature means: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/literature#Noun

  • pfortuny 38 minutes ago

    Well, then poetry is not literature.

    • thaumasiotes 33 minutes ago

      No, the argument is even dumber than that. The person who writes a poem hasn't created any literature.

      The person who hears that poem in circulation and records it in his notes has created literature; an anthology is literature but an original work isn't.