Comment by neilalexander

Comment by neilalexander 2 hours ago

EU legislation requires a number of design considerations for pedestrian and cyclist collisions, like specific energy absorption requirements for front-impact and side-impact protection, restrictions on sharp corners/steep angles that could concentrate impact forces, minimum clearance around hard internal structures, mandatory ADAS (automated emergency braking, lane departure warnings) etc. Not saying that US cars are "not safe" in a binary fashion but for the most part these things are either optional or unregulated in the US.

ExoticPearTree an hour ago

Yeah, not a fan of cyclists. And it's kind of braindead to have my car break because if I hit a pedestrian somehow it is its job to absorb the impact. Maybe cyclists and pedestrians should be more mindful of their surroundings.

The EU regulations have killed all the nice things about cars: straight lines, retractable headlights and so on.

Reply View 2 replies

neilalexander 6 minutes ago

You know what else will be braindead in your nice world? The child who runs out in front of a car after a rigid tight-angled metal corner drives into their skull. These regulations aren't about blame or "drivers/pedestrians/cyclists should be more aware!", they're about reducing or avoiding as much harm as possible when things don't go to plan and an accident happens.

Reply View | 0 replies
saubeidl an hour ago

The two ton deadly weapon is definitely the one at fault, not the person just living life.
There is no nice things about cars.

Reply View | 0 replies