imglorp 10 hours ago

"potty training". Sorry.

Anyway a chemical or biological sensor in the bowl might be more useful.

Optical could be useful if it's doing spectrographic analysis: the color of poo and urine is sometimes informative.

Reply View 0 replies
venturecruelty 7 hours ago

You pay someone in a developing nation $1.00 per day to look at thousands of photos of shit. Like, how do people think Facebook moderation and semantic labeling happen? Cheap labor in places with no labor laws. It was ever thus.

Reply View 1 reply
  • xp84 3 hours ago

    Appropriate username.

    And oh dear, that’s all too realistic. Imagine responding to the job posting and finding out these are the images you’ll be classifying.

    Reply View 0 replies
hackernudes 10 hours ago

They probably do clinical trials (or at least something like that) where they get baseline data from participants through other means.

Reply View 2 replies
  • joezydeco 10 hours ago

    I'm talking about sold units in the field.

    Reply View 1 reply
    • themafia 7 hours ago

      The same thing we always do. Pay some citizens of an African nation a pitiful wage to just make up annotations.

      Then you can incorporate this into a "health care product" and charge insurance companies insane rates on personal toilet cameras.

      Reply View 0 replies
captainkrtek 9 hours ago

I think the obvious things are:

- Deviation in consistency/texture/color/etc.

- Obvious signs related to the above (eg: diarrhea, dehydration, blood in stool).

Ultimately though, you can get the same results by just looking down yourself and being curious if things look off...

tldr: this feels like literal internet-of-shit IoT stuff.

Reply View 0 replies
g-b-r 9 hours ago

They probably do match it, with data collected from other sources

Reply View 0 replies